Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30695812›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2019

The impact of integration on outpatient chemotherapy use and spending in Medicare.

Jeah Jung, Roger Feldman, Yamini Kalidindi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeah JungDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7574-0677
Roger FeldmanDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Yamini KalidindiDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Population Research InstituteR24HD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI JOHNSON, DAVID R · 2001 to 2016
$9.7M
The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Brian Thiede · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Benefit Generosity, Specialty Drug Use, and Other Health Service Use in MedicareR01AG047934 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI JUNG, JEAH · 2014 to 2016
$783k
NIA NIH HHS 1R01AG047934-01NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047934NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital-physician integration has substantially grown in the United States for the past decade, particularly in certain medical specialties, such as oncology. Yet evidence is scarce on the relation between integration and outpatient specialty care use and spending. We analyzed the impact of oncologist integration on outpatient provider-administered chemotherapy use and spending in Medicare, where prices do not depend on providers' integration status or negotiating power. We addressed oncologists' selective integration and patients' nonrandom choice of oncologists using an instrumental variables method. We found that integrated oncologists reduced the quantity of outpatient chemotherapy drugs but used more expensive treatments. This led to an increase in chemotherapy-drug spending after integration. These findings suggest that changes in treatment patterns-treatment mix and quantity-may be an important mechanism by which integration increases spending. We also found that integration increased spending on chemotherapy administration (the act of injection). This is because integration shifted billing of chemotherapy to hospital outpatient departments, where Medicare payments for chemotherapy administration are higher than those in physician offices. As integration increases, efforts should continue to assess how integration influences patient care and explore policy options to ensure desirable outcomes from integration.

Indexed as

Interinstitutional RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChoice BehaviorFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedModels, EconomicNeoplasmsOncologistsOutpatient Clinics, HospitalAntineoplastic AgentsintegrationMedicare paymentsoutpatient careprovider-administered chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30695812
PMCPMC6405302
OpenAlexW2912425540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.