Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30695634›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2019

Effect of Biochar on Microbial Growth: A Metabolomics and Bacteriological Investigation in E. coli.

Rebecca A Hill, John Hunt, Emily Sanders, Melanie Tran, Griffin A Burk, Todd E Mlsna, Nicholas C Fitzkee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Black Carbon Impacts onEnvironmental science & technology · 2024
    Article
  5. The proteome of bacterial membrane vesicles inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca A HillDepartment of Chemistry , Mississippi State University , Mississippi State , Mississippi 39762 , United States.
John HuntDepartment of Chemistry , Mississippi State University , Mississippi State , Mississippi 39762 , United States.
Emily SandersDepartment of Chemistry , Mississippi State University , Mississippi State , Mississippi 39762 , United States.
Melanie TranDepartment of Chemistry , Mississippi State University , Mississippi State , Mississippi 39762 , United States.
Griffin A BurkDepartment of Chemistry , Mississippi State University , Mississippi State , Mississippi 39762 , United States.
Todd E MlsnaDepartment of Chemistry , Mississippi State University , Mississippi State , Mississippi 39762 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4858-1372
Nicholas C FitzkeeDepartment of Chemistry , Mississippi State University , Mississippi State , Mississippi 39762 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8993-2140
Mississippi State University · US

Funding

Structure, Orientation, and Competitive Interactions of S. Epidermidis Biofilm Proteins on SurfacesR01AI139479 · NIAID · MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FITZKEE, NICHOLAS C · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI139479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochar has been proposed as a soil amendment in agricultural applications due to its advantageous adsorptive properties, high porosity, and low cost. These properties allow biochar to retain soil nutrients, yet the effects of biochar on bacterial growth remain poorly understood. To examine how biochar influences microbial metabolism, Escherichia coli was grown in a complex, well-defined media and treated with either biochar or activated carbon. The concentration of metabolites in the media were then quantified at several time points using NMR spectroscopy. Several metabolites were immediately adsorbed by the char, including l-asparagine, l-glutamine, and l-arginine. However, we find that biochar quantitatively adsorbs less of these metabolic precursors when compared to activated carbon. Electron microscopy reveals differences in surface morphology after cell culture, suggesting that Escherichia coli can form biofilms on the surfaces of the biochar. An examination of significant compounds in the tricarboxylic acid cycle and glycolysis reveals that treatment with biochar is less disruptive than activated carbon throughout metabolism. While both biochar and activated carbon slowed growth compared to untreated media, Escherichia coli in biochar-treated media grew more efficiently, as indicated by a longer logarithmic growth phase and a higher final cell density. This work suggests that biochar can serve as a beneficial soil amendment while minimizing the impact on bacterial viability. In addition, the experiments identify a mechanism for biochar's effectiveness in soil conditioning and reveal how biochar can alter specific bacterial metabolic pathways.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliMetabolomicsCharcoalSoilbiocharCharcoalSoil

Identifiers

PMID30695634
PMCPMC6429029
OpenAlexW2913110776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.