Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30695068›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Strategies to improve dietary, fluid, dialysis or medication adherence in patients with end stage kidney disease on dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized intervention trials.

Karumathil M Murali, Judy Mullan, Steven Roodenrys, Hicham C Hassan, Kelly Lambert, Maureen Lonergan

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karumathil M MuraliDepartment of Nephrology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4827-6981
Judy MullanCentre for Health Research Illawarra Shoalhaven Population (CHRISP), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Steven RoodenrysSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Hicham C HassanDepartment of Nephrology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Kelly LambertCentre for Health Research Illawarra Shoalhaven Population (CHRISP), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5935-7328
Maureen LonerganDepartment of Nephrology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2064-2663
University of Wollongong · AUWollongong Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis, treatment non-adherence is common and results in poor health outcomes. However, the clinical benefits of interventions to improve adherence in dialysis patients are difficult to evaluate since trialled interventions and reported outcomes are highly diverse/ heterogeneous. This review summarizes existing literature on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating adherence interventions in ESKD patients focusing on the intervention category, outcome efficacy and persistence of benefit beyond the intervention.

methodsWe performed electronic database searches in Medline, Embase & Cochrane CENTRAL upto 1st July 2018 for RCTs evaluating interventions to improve diet, fluid, medication or dialysis adherence in ESKD patients. Study characteristics including category of interventions, outcomes, efficacy and follow-up were assessed. Meta-analysis was used to compute pooled estimates of the effects on the commonest reported outcome measures.

resultsFrom 1311 citations, we included 36 RCTs (13 cluster-randomized trials), recruiting a total of 3510 dialysis patients (mean age 55.1 ± 5.8 years, males 58.1%). Overall risk of bias was 'high' for 24 and of 'some concern' for 12 studies. Most interventions (33 trials, 92%) addressed patient related factors, and included educational/cognitive (N = 11), behavioural / counselling (N = 4), psychological/affective (N = 4) interventions or a combination (N = 14) of the above. A majority of (28/36) RCTs showed improvement in some reported outcomes. Surrogate measures like changes in phosphate (N = 19) and inter-dialytic weight gain (N = 15) were the most common reported outcomes and both showed significant improvement in the meta-analysis. Sixteen trials reported follow-up (1-12 months) beyond intervention and the benefits waned or were absent in nine trials within 12 months post-intervention.

conclusionsInterventions to improve treatment adherence result in modest short-term benefits in surrogate outcome measures in dialysis patients, but significant improvements in trial design and outcome reporting are warranted to identify strategies that would achieve meaningful and sustainable clinical benefits. LIMITATIONS: Poor methodological quality of trials. Frequent use of surrogate outcomes measures. Low certainly of evidence.

Indexed as

DietHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Education as TopicHealth BehaviorHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPhosphatesRenal DialysisSelf CarePhosphates

Identifiers

PMID30695068
PMCPMC6350978
OpenAlexW2913131300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.