Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30694724›Full record

ReviewJournal of women's health (2002)2019

Dry Eye Disease: Consideration for Women's Health.

Cynthia Matossian, Marguerite McDonald, Kendall E Donaldson, Kelly K Nichols, Sarah MacIver, Preeya K Gupta

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of women's health (2002), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Impact of signs and symptoms of dry eye disease on health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional population study among older adults.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  18. Oral Intake ofBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Cynthia Matossian1 Matossian Eye Associates, Pennington and Pennington, New Jersey.
Marguerite McDonald2 Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Lynbrook, New York.
Kendall E Donaldson3 Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Kelly K Nichols4 School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Sarah MacIver5 School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Preeya K Gupta6 Division of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University · USOphthalmic Consultants of Long Island · USPhiladelphia Eye Associates · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder of the ocular surface and tear homeostasis that can result in discomfort, pain, and visual disturbance. Untreated, DED can become chronic, progressive, and significantly affect an individual's quality of life. Women are disproportionately affected by DED, are diagnosed at a younger age, and experience more severe symptoms compared with men. DED is associated with a wide range of comorbid conditions; there is a strong association between DED and autoimmune disorders, especially those that affect women at many times the rate of men. Treatment response questionnaires indicate women respond better to a wellness model of treatment for DED than men. Furthermore, women's health care-seeking behaviors provide opportunities for general practitioners, specialists, and women's health centers to help identify women with DED or at risk for DED for referral to an eye care specialist. This review of the prevalence of DED in women, and gender and sex-specific aspects of DED, highlight a significant opportunity for action. Earlier diagnosis and treatment of this common but burdensome condition could significantly improve a woman's quality of life.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceQuality of LifeRisk FactorsSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsWomen's Healthautoimmune diseasechroniccomorbid conditionsdry eye diseaseepidemiologypostmenopausal womenprimary careprogressivequality of life

Identifiers

PMID30694724
PMCPMC6482917
OpenAlexW2911961397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.