Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30694587›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2019

Interpersonal and structural factors associated with receptive syringe-sharing among a prospective cohort of female sex workers who inject drugs.

Ju Nyeong Park, Katherine H A Footer, Michele R Decker, Catherine Tomko, Sean T Allen, Noya Galai, Susan G Sherman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Health inequities faced by sex workers.The Lancet. Public health · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ju Nyeong ParkDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6490-9887
Katherine H A FooterDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michele R DeckerDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Catherine TomkoDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sean T AllenDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Noya GalaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Susan G ShermanDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Anna Palmer Durbin · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
The HIV risk environment of high-risk women: Interaction with public safetyR01DA038499 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHERMAN, SUSAN G. · 2015 to 2018
$2.8M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo determine the interpersonal and structural factors associated with receptive syringe sharing (RSS) among female sex workers who inject drugs (FSW-IDU), a group at high risk of HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) acquisition.

designSex workers And Police Promoting Health In Risky Environments (SAPPHIRE) study, a prospective cohort study.

settingBaltimore, MD, USA

participantsOne hundred and eighty FSW-IDU; mean age = 33 years, 77.1% white and 62.9% in a relationship/married. MEASUREMENTS: Surveys were conducted between April 2016 and February 2018. The main outcome was recent RSS (past 3 months). In addition to socio-demographic characteristics and drug use behaviors, we assessed factors at the interpersonal level, including injection practices, intimate partner and client drug use and exposure to violence. Structural-level factors included methods of syringe access.

findingsNearly all FSW-IDU used heroin (97.1%) or crack cocaine (89.7%). Recent RSS was reported by 18.3%. Syringes were accessed from needle exchange programs (64.6%), pharmacies (29.7%), street sellers (30.3%) or personal networks (29.1%). Some FSW-IDU had clients or intimate partners who injected drugs (26.3 and 26.9%, respectively). Longitudinal factors independently associated with RSS in the multi-level mixed-effects model were recent client violence [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-4.33], having an intimate partner who injected drugs (aOR = 2.18, 95% CI = 0.98-4.85), being injected by others (aOR = 4.95, 95% CI = 2.42-10.10) and obtaining syringes from a street seller (aOR = 1.88, 95% CI = 0.94-3.78) or from a member of their personal network (aOR = 4.43, 95% CI = 2.21-8.90).

conclusionsClient violence, intimate partner injection drug use, being injected by others and obtaining syringes from personal connections appear to increase parenteral HIV/HCV risk among female sex workers who inject drugs.

Indexed as

Sex WorkersSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAdultCocaine-Related DisordersCohort StudiesCrack CocaineFemaleHeroin DependenceHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceNeedle-Exchange ProgramsNeedle SharingPharmaciesProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSexual PartnersCrack CocaineHIV riskinjection drug useintimate partnerssex worksubstance usewomen

Identifiers

PMID30694587
PMCPMC6548574
OpenAlexW2914366811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.