ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2019
Stage-matched survival differences by ethnicity among gastric cancer patients of Asian ancestry treated in the United States.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population-Based Analysis of the Interplay between Rurality and Race in Gastric Adenocarcinoma Survival.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Unmasking Disparities in Gallbladder Cancer Outcomes in the Disaggregated Asian American Population.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Race and Ethnicity, Stage-Specific Mortality, and Cancer Treatment in Esophageal and Gastric Cancers: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (2000-2018).Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Better Prognosis of Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Than Gastric Adenocarcinoma among Whites in the United States: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Based on SEER.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Outcomes of Radiotherapy for Mesenchymal and Non-Mesenchymal Subtypes of Gastric Cancer.Cancers · 2020Article
- Cautious optimism-the current role of immunotherapy in gastrointestinal cancers.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDifferences have been noted in overall survival (OS) in gastric cancer (GC) between trials conducted in Western vs Asian countries. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) reports outcomes and patient/disease variables relevant to OS.
methodsUsing NCDB, we identified 89 558 adult patients with GC diagnosed (2004-2012), where self-reported race/ethnicity was available. Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate multivariable hazard ratio (HR) of death, adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, gender, insurance, histology, grade, location, stage, and treatment type.
resultsAfter adjustment, Asian patients had improved OS (HR = 0.74, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.71-0.77). There were differences in OS between Asian ethnicities compared with white patients (n = 69 945), notably with Korean (n = 1249, HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.64-0.75), Chinese (n = 1271, HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.64-0.75), and Indian/Pakistani patients (n = 492, HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.61-0.76). Japanese (n = 829, HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.77-0.91) and Vietnamese (n = 560, HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.71-0.88) OS was also improved (P < 0.0001), while Filipino patients showed no difference (n = 415, HR = 1.00). Black patients had slightly improved OS (n = 13 500, HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.95-1.00, P = 0.035).
conclusionsThis analysis supports improved OS in Asian patients independent of stage, treatment, and known patient or disease characteristics in this large US cohort, and is the largest to define OS differences between Asian ethnicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.