ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2019
Experimental validation of the 3-parameter critical power model in cycling.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- RACLET: the Ramp Above Critical Level Endurance Test to evaluate critical velocity in running.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- RACLET: the Ramp Above Critical Level Endurance Test to evaluate critical power in cycling.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- The effect of reducing work rate on total work done and time to task failure during severe intensity exercise.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Impact of Heat and Humidity on Critical Power and Physiological Responses during the Three-Minute All-Out Test in Cyclists.Journal of human kinetics · 2026Article
- The three-dimensional impulse-response model: Modeling the training process in accordance with energy system-specific adaptation.PloS one · 2026Article
- Incline dependence of the power-duration relationship in cross-country skiing.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Energetics of sinusoidal exercise below and across critical power and the effects of fatigue.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Article
- Adaptations to 4 weeks of high-intensity interval training in healthy adults with different training backgrounds.European journal of applied physiology · 2023Article
- Anaerobic work capacity in cycling: the effect of computational method.European journal of applied physiology · 2022Article
- A century of exercise physiology: key concepts on coupling respiratory oxygen flow to muscle energy demand during exercise.European journal of applied physiology · 2022Review
- Is a verification phase needed to determineEuropean journal of applied physiology · 2021Article
- Novel insights on caffeine supplementation, CYP1A2 genotype, physiological responses and exercise performance.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Review
- A regression method for the power-duration relationship when both variables are subject to error.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe three-parameter model of critical power (3-p) implies that in the severe exercise intensity domain time to exhaustion (T
methodsTen subjects performed an incremental test and nine constant-power trials to exhaustion on an electronically braked cycle ergometer. All trials were fitted to 3-p by means of non-linear regression, and those with T
resultsT
conclusions3-p is a good descriptor of the work capacity above ẇ
Indexed as
Identifiers
30694386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.