Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30694113›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2019

Immunocytochemistry of mesenteric lymph node fine-needle aspirates in the diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis.

Sandra Felten, Katrin Hartmann, Stefanie Doerfelt, Laura Sangl, Johannes Hirschberger, Kaspar Matiasek

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra FeltenClinic of Small Animal Medicine (Felten, Hartmann, Doerfelt, Sangl, Hirschberger), Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Germany.
Katrin HartmannClinic of Small Animal Medicine (Felten, Hartmann, Doerfelt, Sangl, Hirschberger), Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Germany.
Stefanie DoerfeltClinic of Small Animal Medicine (Felten, Hartmann, Doerfelt, Sangl, Hirschberger), Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Germany.
Laura SanglClinic of Small Animal Medicine (Felten, Hartmann, Doerfelt, Sangl, Hirschberger), Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Germany.
Johannes HirschbergerClinic of Small Animal Medicine (Felten, Hartmann, Doerfelt, Sangl, Hirschberger), Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Germany.
Kaspar MatiasekClinic of Small Animal Medicine (Felten, Hartmann, Doerfelt, Sangl, Hirschberger), Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of tissue samples is considered the gold standard for diagnosing feline infectious peritonitis (FIP), and, in cats without body cavity effusion, IHC is the only method available to establish definitive antemortem diagnosis. However, IHC requires invasive tissue sample collection. We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of an immunocytochemical assay of fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) of mesenteric lymph nodes that can be obtained noninvasively by ultrasound-guided aspiration to diagnose FIP. FNAs of mesenteric lymph nodes were obtained postmortem from 41 cats suspected of having FIP based on clinical and/or laboratory findings. FIP was confirmed immunohistochemically in 30 cats. In the other 11 cats, a disease other than FIP, which explained the clinical signs, was diagnosed histopathologically. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) was performed as an avidin-biotin complex method using a monoclonal anti-FCoV IgG 2A. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values (NPV, PPV, respectively) including 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were determined. ICC was positive in 17 of 30 cats with FIP, but also in 1 of 11 control cats that was diagnosed with lymphoma. Sensitivity of ICC was 53% (95% CI: 34-72); specificity 91% (95% CI: 59-100); NPV 42% (95% CI: 22-63); and PPV 94% (95% CI: 71-100). In a lethal disease such as FIP, specificity is most important in order to avoid euthanasia of unaffected cats. Given that a false-positive result occurred and FIP was correctly detected in only approximately half of the cases of FIP, ICC of mesenteric lymph node FNA alone cannot reliably confirm or exclude FIP, but can be a helpful test in conjunction with other diagnostic measures.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCatsCoronavirus, FelineFeline Infectious PeritonitisImmunohistochemistryLymph NodesSensitivity and SpecificityFeline infectious peritonitisfine-needle aspirationimmunocytochemistryimmunohistochemistrylymph node

Identifiers

PMID30694113
PMCPMC6838827
OpenAlexW2914719556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.