Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30694009›Full record

ArticleDepression and anxiety2019

Prospective associations of perceived unit cohesion with postdeployment mental health outcomes.

Lauren Anderson, Laura Campbell-Sills, Robert J Ursano, Ronald C Kessler, Xiaoying Sun, Steven G Heeringa, Matthew K Nock, Paul D Bliese, Oscar I Gonzalez, Gary H Wynn and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Depression and anxiety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Tattooing Among Combat Soldiers as a Coping Resource With Their Military Service Experiences.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing the psychometric properties of the Army STARRS' vertical unit cohesion scale: A large-scale, longitudinal study.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Rat Models in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Research: Strengths, Limitations, and Implications for Translational Studies.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. The role of unit cohesion and perceived resilience in substance use disorder.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Longitudinal studies on cohesion in a military context - A systematic review.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perceptions of purpose, cohesion, and military leadership: A path analysis of potential primary prevention targets to mitigate suicidal ideation.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren AndersonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Laura Campbell-SillsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0002-2716-5441
Robert J UrsanoCenter for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-1861-9173
Ronald C KesslerDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4831-2305
Xiaoying SunDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Steven G HeeringaInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Matthew K NockDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Paul D BlieseDepartment of Management, Darla Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Oscar I GonzalezCenter for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Gary H WynnCenter for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sonia JainDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Murray B SteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
University of California San Diego · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Modifiable Risk and Protective Factors for Suicidal Behaviors in the US ArmyU01MH087981 · NIMH · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI STEIN, MURRAY B., URSANO, ROBERT J. · 2009 to 2013
$65.0M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH087981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior investigations have found negative associations between military unit cohesion and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); however, most relied on cross-sectional data and few examined relationships of unit cohesion to other mental disorders. This study evaluates prospective associations of perceived unit cohesion with a range of mental health outcomes following combat deployment.

methodsU.S. Army soldiers were surveyed approximately 1-2 months before deployment to Afghanistan (T0); and 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 9 months (T3) after return from deployment. Logistic regression was performed to estimate associations of perceived unit cohesion at T0 with risk of PTSD, major depressive episode (MDE), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), alcohol or substance use disorder (AUD/SUD), and suicidal ideation at T2 or T3 among soldiers who completed all study assessments (N = 4,645). Models were adjusted for sociodemographic and Army service characteristics, predeployment history of the index outcome, and deployment stress exposure.

resultsHigher perceived unit cohesion at T0 was associated with lower risk of PTSD, MDE, GAD, AUD/SUD, and suicidal ideation at T2 or T3 (AORs = 0.72 to 0.85 per standard score increase in unit cohesion; P-values < 0.05). Models of incidence of mental disorders and suicidal ideation among soldiers without these problems predeployment yielded similar results, except that perceived unit cohesion was not associated with incident AUD/SUD.

conclusionsSoldiers who reported strong unit cohesion before deployment had lower risk of postdeployment mental disorders and suicidal ideation. Awareness of associations of perceived unit cohesion with postdeployment mental health may facilitate targeting of prevention programs.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdultAfghan Campaign 2001-AlcoholismAnxiety DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLogistic ModelsMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMental DisordersMilitary PersonnelProspective StudiesStress Disorders, Post-Traumaticanxiety disordersmajor depressive disordermilitary personnelposttraumatic stress disorderrisk factorssuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID30694009
PMCPMC7058190
OpenAlexW2912379215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.