Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30693864›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2019

Exposure to Livestock Feces and Water Quality, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Conditions among Caregivers and Young Children: Formative Research in Rural Burkina Faso.

Francis Ngure, Aulo Gelli, Elodie Becquey, Rasmané Ganaba, Derek Headey, Lieven Huybregts, Abdoulaye Pedehombga, Armande Sanou, Abdoulaye Traore, Florence Zongo and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Measurement in the study of human exposure to animal feces: A systematic review and audit.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Co-occurrence ofFrontiers in public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francis NgureIndependent Research Consultant, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, District of Colombia and Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Aulo GelliInternational Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, District of Columbia.
Elodie BecqueyInternational Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, District of Columbia.
Rasmané GanabaAgence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSante), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Derek HeadeyInternational Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, District of Columbia.
Lieven HuybregtsInternational Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, District of Columbia.
Abdoulaye PedehombgaAgence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSante), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Armande SanouAgence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSante), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Abdoulaye TraoreAgence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSante), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Florence ZongoAgence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSante), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Amanda ZongroneInternational Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, District of Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock farming is common in low-income settings as a source of income and animal-sourced food. However, there is growing evidence of the harmful health effects of proximity of animals to infants and young children, especially through exposure to zoonotic pathogens. Poultry ownership is almost universal in rural Burkina Faso. Poultry feces are a significant risk factor for enteric diseases that are associated with child undernutrition. To investigate the extent of exposure to livestock feces among young children and caregivers, we conducted direct observations of 20 caregiver-child dyads for a total of 80 hours (4 hours per dyad) and recorded water quality, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH)-related behaviors. We also undertook in-depth interviews with these caregivers and focus group discussions with separate groups of men and women who were poultry farmers. Poultry and other livestock feces were visible in all 20 and 19 households, respectively, in both kitchen areas and in the household courtyards where children frequently sit or crawl. Direct soil ingestion by young children was observed in almost half of the households (45%). Poor handwashing practices were also common among caregivers and children. Although latrines were available in almost all households, child feces disposal practices were inadequate. This body of research suggests an urgent need to adapt conventional WASH and livestock interventions to reduce the exposure of infants and young children to livestock feces.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureWater QualityAnimalsBurkina FasoCaregiversChild, PreschoolFamily CharacteristicsFecesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansHygieneInfantLivestockMalePoultry

Identifiers

PMID30693864
PMCPMC6447103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.