Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30693612›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Neural mechanisms of training an auditory event-related potential task in a brain-computer interface context.

Sebastian Halder, Teresa Leinfelder, Stefan M Schulz, Andrea Kübler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sebastian HalderSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1017-3696
Teresa LeinfelderInstitute of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefan M SchulzInstitute of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Andrea KüblerInstitute of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt FoundationAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungHuman Brain Project HBP-SP3-SGA1 Conscious Brain 72027Norges Forskningsråd Neurophysiological assessment of consciousness 262950/F20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective use of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) typically requires training. Improved understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying BCI training will facilitate optimisation of BCIs. The current study examined the neural mechanisms related to training for electroencephalography (EEG)-based communication with an auditory event-related potential (ERP) BCI. Neural mechanisms of training in 10 healthy volunteers were assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during an auditory ERP-based BCI task before (t1) and after (t5) three ERP-BCI training sessions outside the fMRI scanner (t2, t3, and t4). Attended stimuli were contrasted with ignored stimuli in the first-level fMRI data analysis (t1 and t5); the training effect was verified using the EEG data (t2-t4); and brain activation was contrasted before and after training in the second-level fMRI data analysis (t1 vs. t5). Training increased the communication speed from 2.9 bits/min (t2) to 4 bits/min (t4). Strong activation was found in the putamen, supplementary motor area (SMA), and superior temporal gyrus (STG) associated with attention to the stimuli. Training led to decreased activation in the superior frontal gyrus and stronger haemodynamic rebound in the STG and supramarginal gyrus. The neural mechanisms of ERP-BCI training indicate improved stimulus perception and reduced mental workload. The ERP task used in the current study showed overlapping activations with a motor imagery based BCI task from a previous study on the neural mechanisms of BCI training in the SMA and putamen. This suggests commonalities between the neural mechanisms of training for both BCI paradigms.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyFunctional NeuroimagingPractice, PsychologicalAdultAttentionAuditory PerceptionCerebral CortexEvent-Related Potentials, P300Evoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor CortexParietal Lobeauditorybrain-computer interfaceelectroencephalographyevent-related potentialsfunctional magnetic resonance imagingneural mechanismstraining

Identifiers

PMID30693612
PMCPMC6865430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.