Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30693438›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2019

A cross-sectional survey of Australian anesthetists' and surgeons' perceptions of preoperative risk stratification and prehabilitation.

Michael H-G Li, Vladimir Bolshinsky, Hilmy Ismail, Kate Burbury, Kwok M Ho, Babak Amin, Alexander Heriot, Bernhard Riedel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04789694 (Prehabilitation in Patients With Gynaecological Cancer Planned for Postponed Surgical Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04789694 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Prehabilitation in Patients With Gynaecological Cancer Planned for Postponed Surgical Management: A Prospective Randomised Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2021 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsOvarian Cancer, Ovarian Cancer Stage III, Ovarian Cancer Stage IV, Endometrial CancerArmsPhysiological intervention, Psychological intervention, Nutritional intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prehabilitation for cancer surgery: perspectives of Australian patients, families, and health professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael H-G LiDepartment of Cancer Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. Michael.Huagen.Li@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4305-399X
Vladimir BolshinskyDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Hilmy IsmailDepartment of Cancer Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Kate BurburyDepartment of Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Kwok M HoSchool of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Babak AminDepartment of Cancer Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Alexander HeriotDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Bernhard RiedelDepartment of Cancer Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUMurdoch University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePreoperative fitness training has been listed as a top ten research priority in anesthesia. We aimed to capture the current practice patterns and perspectives of anesthetists and colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand regarding preoperative risk stratification and prehabilitation to provide a basis for implementation research.

methodsDuring 2016, we separately surveyed fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) and members of the Colorectal Society of Surgeons in Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ). Our outcome measures investigated the responders' demographics, practice patterns, and perspectives. Practice patterns examined preoperative assessment and prehabilitation utilizing exercise, hematinic, and nutrition optimization.

resultsWe received 155 responses from anesthetists and 71 responses from colorectal surgeons. We found that both specialty groups recognized that functional capacity was linked to postoperative outcome; however, fewer agreed that robust evidence exists for prehabilitation. Prehabilitation in routine practice remains low, with significant potential for expansion. The majority of anesthetists do not believe their patients are adequately risk stratified before surgery, and most of their colorectal colleagues are amenable to delaying surgery for at least an additional two weeks. Two-thirds of anesthetists did not use cardiopulmonary exercise testing as they lacked access. Hematinic and nutritional assessment and optimization is less frequently performed by anesthetists compared with their colorectal colleagues.

conclusionsAn unrecognized potential window for prehabilitation exists in the two to four weeks following cancer diagnosis. Early referral, larger multi-centre studies focusing on long-term outcomes, and further implementation research are required.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyAnesthetistsAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseExercise TestHumansNew ZealandPractice Patterns, Physicians'Preoperative CareRisk AssessmentSurgeonsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30693438
OpenAlexW2914560092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.