Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30693409›Full record

SynthesisNeuroradiology2019

Radiological scales predicting delayed cerebral ischemia in subarachnoid hemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wessel E van der Steen, Eva L Leemans, René van den Berg, Yvo B W E M Roos, Henk A Marquering, Dagmar Verbaan, Charles B L M Majoie

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wessel E van der SteenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Room L0-106, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva L LeemansDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Room L0-106, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
René van den BergDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yvo B W E M RoosDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk A MarqueringDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Room L0-106, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.a.marquering@amc.uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-6313
Dagmar VerbaanNeurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles B L M MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NL

Funding

Fonds NutsOhra 1403-023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDelayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a severe complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The extent of subarachnoid blood is a strong predictor of DCI and is frequently estimated with the Fisher scale, modified Fisher scale, or Hijdra sum score. It is unclear which scale has the strongest association with clinical DCI. To evaluate this, we performed a systematic review of the literature.

methodsWe performed a MEDLINE and EMBASE search from 1980 to 20th of June 2017. Radiological grade and occurrence of clinical DCI were extracted along with odds ratios (ORs) for DCI. When possible, pooled ORs with 95% confidence intervals were calculated per grade increase on the radiological scale.

resultsFifty-three studies were included. The Fisher scale was significantly associated with DCI in 62% of the studies compared to 88-100% for the other scales. In studies using the Fisher scale, Fisher 3 had the strongest association with DCI (pooled OR 3.21 (1.87-5.49)). In studies using the modified Fisher score, DCI occurred most frequently (42%) in modified Fisher 4. No pooled OR could be calculated for the other scales.

conclusionThe Fisher scale, modified Fisher scale, and Hijdra sum score are all associated with clinical DCI. The risk of DCI, however, does not increase with increasing Fisher grade as opposed to the modified Fisher scale. Furthermore, the modified Fisher scale was more commonly significantly associated with DCI than the Fisher scale, which may advocate using the modified Fisher in future SAH-related studies.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaHumansPredictive Value of TestsSeverity of Illness IndexSubarachnoid HemorrhageTime FactorsDelayed cerebral ischemiaRadiological scaleSubarachnoid hemorrhageSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30693409
OpenAlexW2913602431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.