ArticleOphthalmology. Retina
Deep learning is effective for the classification of OCT images of normal versus Age-related Macular Degeneration.
Article in Ophthalmology. Retina. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 236 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
236 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Performance of Deep Learning in Classifying Age-Related Macular Degeneration From Images: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Optical coherence tomography imaging biomarkers associated with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review.Eye (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: systematic review of test accuracy.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy: the Real-World Emerging Application.Current diabetes reports · 2019Pooled it
- Beyond Performance Metrics: Automatic Deep Learning Retinal OCT Analysis Reproduces Clinical Trial Outcome.Ophthalmology · 2020Trial
- Current Trends in AI and Eye Disease Diagnostics.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Choroideremia andOphthalmology science · 2026Article
- Deep learning approach for analyzing regional scheimpflug corneal images to assess keratoconus progression.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Utility of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of central serous chorioretinopathy: a narrative review.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Review
- A three-dimensional multi-modal foundation model for optical coherence tomography.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- A Simplified Classification for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Based on Optical Coherence Tomography.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Investigating the Impact of Semi-Supervised Learning Methods to Improve the Quality of Diagnosis of Retinal Diseases from OCT Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Low-Rank Fine-Tuning Meets Cross-modal Analysis: A Robust Framework for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Categorization.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence based prediction of first recurrence in neovascular age related macular degeneration with validation by 19 experts.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Using deep learning to identify inherited retinal diseases based on wide-field retinal imaging data.PloS one · 2026Article
- CLEAR report 1: a scoping review and meta-analysis for definitions, imaging metrics, and functional correlates of photoreceptor integrity in AMD.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Beyond convolutions and supervised learning with transformers and representation learning for retinal image analysis.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2026Review
- A Novel Chaos-inspired Artificial Intelligence-based Model for Keratoconus Prediction.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2026Article
- Multi-OCT-SelfNet: integrating self-supervised learning with multi-source data fusion for enhanced multi-class retinal disease classification.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
176 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byReply.2018
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe advent of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) with large electronic imaging databases along with advances in deep neural networks with machine learning has provided a unique opportunity to achieve milestones in automated image analysis. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the most commonly obtained imaging modality in ophthalmology and represents a dense and rich dataset when combined with labels derived from the EMR. We sought to determine if deep learning could be utilized to distinguish normal OCT images from images from patients with Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD).
designEMR and OCT database study. SUBJECTS: Normal and AMD patients who had a macular OCT.
methodsAutomated extraction of an OCT imaging database was performed and linked to clinical endpoints from the EMR. OCT macula scans were obtained by Heidelberg Spectralis, and each OCT scan was linked to EMR clinical endpoints extracted from EPIC. The central 11 images were selected from each OCT scan of two cohorts of patients: normal and AMD. Cross-validation was performed using a random subset of patients. Receiver operator curves (ROC) were constructed at an independent image level, macular OCT level, and patient level.
main outcome measureArea under the ROC.
resultsOf a recent extraction of 2.6 million OCT images linked to clinical datapoints from the EMR, 52,690 normal macular OCT images and 48,312 AMD macular OCT images were selected. A deep neural network was trained to categorize images as either normal or AMD. At the image level, we achieved an area under the ROC of 92.78% with an accuracy of 87.63%. At the macula level, we achieved an area under the ROC of 93.83% with an accuracy of 88.98%. At a patient level, we achieved an area under the ROC of 97.45% with an accuracy of 93.45%. Peak sensitivity and specificity with optimal cutoffs were 92.64% and 93.69% respectively.
conclusionsDeep learning techniques achieve high accuracy and is effective as a new image classification technique. These findings have important implications in utilizing OCT in automated screening and the development of computer aided diagnosis tools in the future.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.