Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30693343›Full record

ReviewBrain circulation

Brain-gut axis after stroke.

Awadhesh K Arya, Bingren Hu

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect ofInternational journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Lipid metabolism, microglia, and stroke.Neural regeneration research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Regulation of histidine metabolism byActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Awadhesh K AryaDepartment of Neurology and Anesthesiology, Shock Trauma and Anesthesiology Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bingren HuDepartment of Neurology and Anesthesiology, Shock Trauma and Anesthesiology Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Novel anti-NPC aggregation strategy against brain ischemia-reperfusion injuryR01NS097875 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HU, BINGREN · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Change in NSF ATPase activity Leads to Brain Ischemia Reperfusion InjuryR01NS102815 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HU, BINGREN · 2018 to 2023
$1.7M
BLRD VA I01 BX003926BLRD VA IS1 BX004389NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097875NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke leads to inflammatory and immune response in the brain and immune organs. The gut or gastrointestinal tract is a major immune organ equipped with the largest pool of immune cells representing more than 70% of the entire immune system and the largest population of macrophages in the human body. The bidirectional communication between the brain and the gut is commonly known as brain-gut or gut-brain axis. Stroke often leads to gut dysmotility, gut microbiota dysbiosis, "leaky" gut, gut hemorrhage, and even gut-origin sepsis, which is often associated with poor prognosis. Emerging evidence suggests that gut inflammatory and immune response plays a key role in the pathophysiology of stroke and may become a key therapeutic target for its treatment. Ischemic brain tissue produces damage-associated molecular patterns to initiate innate and adaptive immune response both locally and systemically through the specialized pattern-recognition receptors (e.g., toll-like receptors). After stroke, innate immune cells including neutrophils, microglia or macrophages, mast cells, innate lymphocytes (IL-17 secreting γδ T-cell), and natural killer T-cell respond within hours, followed by the adaptive immune response through activation of T and B lymphocytes. Subpopulations of T-cells can help or worsen ischemic brain injury. Pro-inflammatory Th1, Th17, and γδ T-cells are often associated with increased inflammatory damage, whereas regulatory T-cells are known to suppress postischemic inflammation by increasing the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. Although known to play a key role, research in the gut inflammatory and immune response after stroke is still in its initial stage. A better understanding of the gut inflammatory and immune response after stroke may be important for the development of effective stroke therapies. The present review will discuss recent advances in the studies of the brain-gut axis after stroke, the key issues to be solved, and the future directions.

Indexed as

and γδ T-cellsBrain–gut or gut–brain axisdamage-associated molecular patternsgut inflammatory and immune responsemacrophagemicemicrogliamiddle cerebral artery occlusionregulatory T-cellsstrokeTh1Th17

Identifiers

PMID30693343
PMCPMC6329216
OpenAlexW2907957406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.