Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30693134›Full record

ReviewScientifica2018

Cutaneous Side Effects of Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Advanced Melanoma.

Irene Russo, Ludovica Zorzetto, Vanna Chiarion Sileni, Mauro Alaibac

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scientifica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. BRAFAdvances in therapy · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Clinical features of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome to BRAF inhibitors with and without previous immune checkpoint inhibition: a review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Clinical Translation of Combined MAPK and Autophagy Inhibition inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. [Supportive therapy and management of side effects in dermato-oncology].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene RussoUnit of Dermatology, University of Padua, Via Gallucci 4, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Ludovica ZorzettoUnit of Dermatology, University of Padua, Via Gallucci 4, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Vanna Chiarion SileniIstituto Oncologico Veneto I.R.C.C.S., Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Mauro AlaibacUnit of Dermatology, University of Padua, Via Gallucci 4, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6524-4848
University of Padua · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma is one of the most fatal cancers, and its incidence is increasing worldwide. Thanks to the better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of melanoma, recently new targeted agents have been developed. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge of clinical presentation, mechanisms, and management of the most common cutaneous side effects observed during treatment with targeted and immunological therapies approved for advanced melanoma. We include discussion of BRAF/MEK inhibitors and immune-checkpoint inhibitors, notably CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors.

Identifiers

PMID30693134
PMCPMC6332919
OpenAlexW2907791824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.