Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30693111›Full record

ArticleJournal of lipids2018

Developing a Modified Low-Density Lipoprotein (M-LDL-C) Friedewald's Equation as a Substitute for Direct LDL-C Measure in a Ghanaian Population: A Comparative Study.

Richard K D Ephraim, Emmanuel Acheampong, Swithin M Swaray, Enoch Odame Anto, Hope Agbodzakey, Prince Adoba, Bright Oppong Afranie, Emmanuella Nsenbah Batu, Patrick Adu, Linda Ahenkorah Fondjo and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of lipids, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Richard K D EphraimDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-5572-9059
Emmanuel AcheampongDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-5338-3258
Swithin M SwarayDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Enoch Odame AntoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-9023-6612
Hope AgbodzakeyDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.
Prince AdobaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-8291-1371
Bright Oppong AfranieDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.
Emmanuella Nsenbah BatuDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.
Patrick AduDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-9686-8300
Linda Ahenkorah FondjoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-0252-3190
Samuel Asamoah SakyiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-5168-4762
Beatrice AmoahDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHUniversity of Cape Coast · GHEdith Cowan University · AUDalian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the availability of several homogenous LDL-C assays, calculated Friedewald's LDL-C equation remains the widely used formula in clinical practice. Several novel formulas developed in different populations have been reported to outperform the Friedewald formula. This study validated the existing LDL-C formulas and derived a modified LDL-C formula specific to a Ghanaian population. In this comparative study, we recruited 1518 participants, derived a new modified Friedewald's LDL-C (M-LDL-C) equation, evaluated LDL-C by Friedewald's formula (F-LDL-C), Martin's formula (N-LDL-C), Anandaraja's formula (A-LDL-C), and compared them to direct measurement of LDL-C (D-LDL-C). The mean D-LDL-C (2.47±0.71 mmol/L) was significantly lower compared to F-LDL-C (2.76±1.05 mmol/L), N-LDL-C (2.74±1.04 mmol/L), A-LDL-C (2.99±1.02 mmol/L), and M-LDL-C (2.97±1.08 mmol/L) p < 0.001. There was a significantly positive correlation between D-LDL-C and A-LDL-C (r=0.658, p<0.0001), N-LDL-C (r=0.693, p<0.0001), and M-LDL-C (r=0.693, p<0.0001). M-LDL-c yielded a better diagnostic performance [(area under the curve (AUC)=0.81; sensitivity (SE) (60%) and specificity (SP) (88%)] followed by N-LDL-C [(AUC=0.81; SE (63%) and SP (85%)], F-LDL-C [(AUC=0.80; SE (63%) and SP (84%)], and A-LDL-C (AUC=0.77; SE (68%) and SP (78%)] using D-LDL-C as gold standard. Bland-Altman plots showed a definite agreement between means and differences of D-LDL-C and the calculated formulas with 95% of values lying within ±0.50 SD limits. The modified LDL-C (M-LDL-C) formula derived by this study yielded a better diagnostic accuracy compared to A-LDL-C and F-LDL-C equations and thus could serve as a substitute for D-LDL-C and F-LDL-C equations in the Ghanaian population.

Identifiers

PMID30693111
PMCPMC6332996
OpenAlexW2906834549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.