Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30692975›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Comparative Evaluation of Microbiota Engraftment Following Fecal Microbiota Transfer in Mice Models: Age, Kinetic and Microbial Status Matter.

Tiphaine Le Roy, Jean Debédat, Florian Marquet, Carla Da-Cunha, Farid Ichou, Michèle Guerre-Millo, Nathalie Kapel, Judith Aron-Wisnewsky, Karine Clément

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tiphaine Le RoyNutriOmics Team, INSERM, ICAN, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Jean DebédatNutriOmics Team, INSERM, ICAN, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Florian MarquetNutriOmics Team, INSERM, ICAN, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Carla Da-CunhaNutriOmics Team, INSERM, ICAN, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Farid IchouICANalytics Facility Core, Institut de Cardiométabolisme et Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France.
Michèle Guerre-MilloNutriOmics Team, INSERM, ICAN, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Nathalie KapelDepartment of Functional Coprology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Judith Aron-WisnewskyNutriOmics Team, INSERM, ICAN, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Karine ClémentNutriOmics Team, INSERM, ICAN, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRSorbonne Université · FRUnité de recherche sur les maladies cardiovasculaires et métaboliques · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intestinal microbiota and its functions are intricately interwoven with host physiology. Colonizing rodents with donor microbiota provides insights into host-microbiota interactions characterization and the understanding of disease physiopathology. However, a better assessment of inoculation methods and recipient mouse models is needed. Here, we compare the engraftment at short and long term of genetically obese mice microbiota in germ-free (GF) mice and juvenile and adult specific pathogen free (SPF) mice. We also tested the effects of initial microbiota depletion before microbiota transfer. In the present work, donor microbiota engraftment was better in juvenile SPF mice than in adult SPF mice. In juvenile mice, initial microbiota depletion using laxatives or antibiotics improved donor microbiota engraftment 9 weeks but not 3 weeks after microbiota transfer. Microbiota-depleted juvenile mice performed better than GF mice 3 weeks after the microbiota transfer. However, 9 weeks after transfer, colonized GF mice microbiota had the lowest Unifrac distance to the donor microbiota. Colonized GF mice were also characterized by a chronic alteration in intestinal absorptive function. With these collective results, we show that the use of juvenile mice subjected to initial microbiota depletion constitutes a valid alternative to GF mice in microbiota transfer studies.

Indexed as

adultantibioticsFMT fecal microbiota transplantgerm-free animalsmicrobiotapolyethylene glycolSPFweaning (severage)

Identifiers

PMID30692975
PMCPMC6339881
OpenAlexW2909474991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.