Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30692861›Full record

ReviewNoro psikiyatri arsivi2018

What We Learned from The History of Multiple Sclerosis Measurement: Expanded Disability Status Scale.

Bilge Piri Çinar, Yüksel Güven Yorgun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bilge Piri ÇinarNeurology Department, Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Yüksel Güven YorgunNeurology Department, Ödemiş State Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is often seen in young adults and known to cause both physical and cognitive disability, and it is quite important to make an objective assessment of the physical-cognitive disability status of the patients. The first scale that assesses the physical disability in MS cases, the Disability Status Scale (DSS) elaborated in 1983 and transformed into the Expanded DSS (EDSS). It has been in use since 1983 without much change, which is one of its most significant advantages. It includes all functional systems (although with some shortcomings) that may be affected in MS and reflects the clinical status as a number, which is quite valuable. Although there may be differences between EDSS practitioners, it has been in use for more than 30 years and it can objectively display the difference between a patient's clinical picture 20 years ago and today, which can be said for only a small number of scales. This shows the importance of using the same scale for diseases that require long-term monitoring such as MS. In conclusion; it is a consensus that EDSS will not undergo major changes so that its greatest advantage can be preserved. Also, the consensus in the available literature is that EDSS will never lose its value.

Indexed as

Expanded disability status scalemultiple sclerosisphysical disabilityprogression

Identifiers

PMID30692861
PMCPMC6278618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.