ReviewNoro psikiyatri arsivi2018
Recent Advances in the Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis; Current New Drugs Specific for Multiple Sclerosis.
Review in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case of relapsing anti-GBM disease secondary to alemtuzumab therapy.CEN case reports · 2024Article
- Unraveling the Role of the Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3β, Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase, and Sphingosine 1 Phosphate Pathways in Multiple Sclerosis.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024Review
- Article
- Beneficial Effect of Melatonin Alone or in Combination with Glatiramer Acetate and Interferon β-1b on Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Immune cells transcriptome-based drug repositioning for multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Therapeutic Value of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms on the Efficacy of New Therapies in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 antagonism for the treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE)-related pain.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2021Article
- Neuroimmune crosstalk and evolving pharmacotherapies in neurodegenerative diseases.Immunology · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the first approved parenteral drug for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) in 1993 (interferon [IFN] beta, and later glatiramer acetate [GA]), today there are both parenteral and oral treatment options for MS. After IFN beta preparations, glatiramer acetate was developed; and, until the approval of natalizumab in 2006, those dominated the treatment of MS. Later on, among oral drug options, cladribine made a promising entry; however, due to safety concerns, it was withdrawn soon. Afterwards, with the understanding of the role of sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) receptors in the pathogenesis of MS, fingolimod was approved in 2010, which was followed by other oral agents such as teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate. Recently newer IV treatment options such as alemtuzumab, rituximab and ocrelizumab have widened the treatment arena. Recently, after submitting new efficacy and safety data, cladribine was approved for MS by EMA, in 2017. Moreover, seven years after its rejection due to safety reasons, in August 2018 FDA accepted to re-evaluate the data of cladribine as a treatment option for relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). Another oral treatment option, Laquinimod, was not approved because it could not be shown to slow disability progression despite favourable effect in relapsing MS. Newer generation S1P receptor modulators are being investigated currently, and they are expected to come into the treatment arena soon. In this article, mechanisms of actions, clinical trial results, and side effects of the newer drugs used for MS, are reviewed. IFN beta and glatiramer acetate were not included since they have clinical experience nearing 30 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.