ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2018
Towards a Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Model for Hospital Websites.
Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of User-Oriented Information Services on the Websites of Large Hospitals in China and the United States: Cross-sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital websites are important sources for patients to access health information.
aimThe purpose of this study was to develop the quality evaluation model for hospital websites.
methodsThe quantitative study was conducted through the modified Delphi method in 2014-2015. The population of the study includes 10 experts were chosen by targeting non-randomized method. A questionnaire was prepared based on the prototype that was developed by research papers and related models. The validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by face validity and CVI and CVR estimation. Reliability was obtained by split-half method (α = 0.8). Experts' opinions were collected through interview. Then, their frequency and percentage were determined. Items with options completely agree and agree over 75% was approved, items below 50% were removed, and items 50%-75% were removed after three interviews repetitions.
resultsMost of the experts agreed about the pleasant and harmonious colors, the readable and consistent fonts (100%). The least frequency was allocated to correct grammar and words, support for multilingual and rapidly changing of displaying pages in the website with a frequency of 2 (20%).
conclusionThe minimum qualitative criteria for a website are usability, efficiency, user friendly, service, reliability and interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.