Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30692710›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2018

Intelligent Computer Systems for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis: a Systematic Review of Reasoning Techniques and Methods.

Leila Akramian Arani, Azamossadat Hosseini, Farkhondeh Asadi, Seyed Ali Masoud, Eslam Nazemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Eye Injury Registries: A Review on Key Registry Processes.Iranian journal of public health · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Diverse Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leila Akramian AraniHealth Information Technology and Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.Tehran.Iran.
Azamossadat HosseiniHealth Information Technology and Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.Tehran.Iran.
Farkhondeh AsadiHealth Information Technology and Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.Tehran.Iran.
Seyed Ali MasoudNeurology Department .Kashan University of Medical Sciences and health services. kashan.iran.
Eslam NazemiComputer Science and Engineering Department, Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran.Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIntelligent computer systems are used in diagnosing Multiple Sclerosis and help physicians in the accurate and timely diagnosis of the disease. This study focuses on a review of different reasoning techniques and methods used in intelligent systems to diagnose MS and analyze the application and efficiency of different reasoning methods in order to find the most efficient and applicable methods and techniques for MS diagnosis.

methodsA complete research was carried out on articles in various electronic databases based on Mesh vocabulary. 85 articles out of 614 articles published in English between 2000 to 2018 were analyzed, 30 of which have been selected based on inclusion criteria such as system scope and domain, full description of reasoning method and system evaluation.

resultsResults indicate that different reasoning methods are used unintelligent systems of MS diagnosis. In 27% of the studies, the rule-based method was used, in 20% the fuzzy logic method, in 18%the artificial neural network method, and in 35% other reasoning methods were used. The average sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of reasoning methods were0.91, 0.77, and 0.86, respectively.

conclusionsRule-based, fuzzy-logic and artificial neural network methods have had more applications in intelligent systems for the diagnosis of MS, respectively. The highest rate of sensitivity and accuracy indexes is associated to the neural network reasoning method at 0.97 and 0.99, respectively .In the fuzzy logic method, the Kappa rate has been reported as one, which shows full conformity between software diagnosis and the physician's decision .In some articles, in order to remove the limitations of the methods and enhance their efficiency, combinations of different methods are used.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceClinical Decision Support TechniquesComputer-AssistedDecision Support SystemsDiagnosisMultiple Sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID30692710
PMCPMC6311112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.