ReviewLeukemia2019
Is lenalidomide the standard-of-care after an autotransplant for plasma cell myeloma?
Review in Leukemia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing Pretransplant and Posttransplant Therapy Response in Multiple Myeloma Patients.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Cellular Immunotherapies for Multiple Myeloma: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Directions.Oncology and therapy · 2022Review
- Review
- Cost-Effectiveness of Post-Autotransplant Lenalidomide in Persons with Multiple Myeloma.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Molecular basis of clonal evolution in multiple myeloma.International journal of hematology · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis reported lenalidomide given after high-dose therapy and an autologous hemopoietic cell transplantation is associated with increase in progression-free survival (PFS) and survival in persons with plasma cell myeloma (PCM). Based on these data, posttransplant lenalidomide is considered by many a standard-of-care in this setting. However, decisions on the use of new therapies should consider not only results of such trials and meta-analyses but also other factors including quality-of-evidence, anticipated desired and undesired effects of the drug, costs and feasibility of the therapy option. In this review, we critically analyzed evidence on posttransplant lenalidomide in PCM, and we identified criteria which should be considered in designating posttransplant lenalidomide the standard-of-care. Using Grading of Evidence, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach we judged posttransplant lenalidomide improves PFS with high-quality evidence. However, we identified inconsistency and imprecision as limitations in the conclusions regarding a survival benefit rating the quality-of-evidence for a survival benefit moderate. We also highlighted inconsistency in claims of an increased risk of new cancers associated with posttransplant lenalidomide. We emphasize the need for a value-based reasoning which considers PFS and survival as well as health-related quality-of-life and costs. We conclude the decision to use posttransplant lenalidomide should be individualized based on pre- and posttransplant variables such as remission state, risk category and/or posttransplant measurable residual disease (MRD)-test results. Validity of these variables in estimating benefits and risks of posttransplant lenalidomide should be tested in randomized clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.