Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30692572›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Differential anti-tumour effects of MTH1 inhibitors in patient-derived 3D colorectal cancer cultures.

Lizet M van der Waals, Jamila Laoukili, Jennifer M J Jongen, Danielle A Raats, Inne H M Borel Rinkes, Onno Kranenburg

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical Significance of NUDT1 (MTH1) Across Cancer Types.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of the NUDT Enzymes in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Inhibitors of DNA Glycosylases as Prospective Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lizet M van der WaalsLaboratory Translational Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2588-6974
Jamila LaoukiliLaboratory Translational Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jennifer M J JongenLaboratory Translational Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Danielle A RaatsLaboratory Translational Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Inne H M Borel RinkesLaboratory Translational Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Onno KranenburgLaboratory Translational Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. o.kranenburg@umcutrecht.nl.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) function as second messengers in signal transduction, but high ROS levels can also cause cell death. MTH1 dephosphorylates oxidized nucleotides, thereby preventing their incorporation into DNA and protecting tumour cells from oxidative DNA damage. Inhibitors of MTH1 (TH588 and (S)-crizotinib) were shown to reduce cancer cell viability. However, the MTH1-dependency of the anti-cancer effects of these drugs has recently been questioned. Here, we have assessed anti-tumour effects of TH588 and (S)-crizotinib in patient-derived 3D colorectal cancer cultures. Hypoxia and reoxygenation - conditions that increase intracellular ROS levels - increased sensitivity to (S)-crizotinib, but not to TH588. (S)-crizotinib reduced tyrosine phosphorylation of c-MET and ErbB3 whereas TH588 induced a mitotic cell cycle arrest, which was not affected by adding ROS-modulating compounds. Furthermore, we show that both compounds induced DNA damage that could not be prevented by adding the ROS inhibitor N-acetyl-L-cysteine. Moreover, adding ROS-modulating compounds did not alter the reduction in viability in response to TH588 and (S)-crizotinib. We conclude that TH588 and (S)-crizotinib have very clear and distinct anti-tumour effects in 3D colorectal cancer cultures, but that these effects most likely occur through distinct and ROS-independent mechanisms.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell ProliferationCell SurvivalColorectal NeoplasmsCrizotinibDNA Repair EnzymesHumansOrganoidsPatient-Specific ModelingPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPhosphorylationPyrimidinesReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal Transduction8-oxodGTPaseCrizotinibDNA Repair EnzymesPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPyrimidinesReactive Oxygen SpeciesTH588 compound

Identifiers

PMID30692572
PMCPMC6349914
OpenAlexW2920581688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.