Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30692525›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

A five-residue motif for the design of domain swapping in proteins.

Neha Nandwani, Parag Surana, Hitendra Negi, Nahren M Mascarenhas, Jayant B Udgaonkar, Ranabir Das, Shachi Gosavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Smolstatin1, a unique cystatin-like stefin ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Design of a light and CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biochemistry · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Protein Assembly by Design.Chemical reviews · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Human DND1-RRM2 forms a non-canonical domain swapped dimer.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neha NandwaniNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, 560065, India.
Parag SuranaNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, 560065, India.
Hitendra NegiNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, 560065, India.
Nahren M MascarenhasNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, 560065, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7707-2764
Jayant B UdgaonkarNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, 560065, India. jayant@iiserpune.ac.in.
Ranabir DasNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, 560065, India. rana@ncbs.res.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5114-6817
Shachi GosaviNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, 560065, India. shachi@ncbs.res.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domain swapping is the process by which identical monomeric proteins exchange structural elements to generate dimers/oligomers. Although engineered domain swapping is a compelling strategy for protein assembly, its application has been limited due to the lack of simple and reliable design approaches. Here, we demonstrate that the hydrophobic five-residue 'cystatin motif' (QVVAG) from the domain-swapping protein Stefin B, when engineered into a solvent-exposed, tight surface loop between two β-strands prevents the loop from folding back upon itself, and drives domain swapping in non-domain-swapping proteins. High-resolution structural studies demonstrate that engineering the QVVAG stretch independently into various surface loops of four structurally distinct non-domain-swapping proteins enabled the design of different modes of domain swapping in these proteins, including single, double and open-ended domain swapping. These results suggest that the introduction of the QVVAG motif can be used as a mutational approach for engineering domain swapping in diverse β-hairpin proteins.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceCystatin BHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsModels, MolecularMutationProtein EngineeringSequence Homology, Amino AcidCystatin B

Identifiers

PMID30692525
PMCPMC6349918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.