Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30692274›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2019

Identification of Candidate Plasma Protein Biomarkers for Cervical Cancer Using the Multiplex Proximity Extension Assay.

Malin Berggrund, Stefan Enroth, Martin Lundberg, Erika Assarsson, Karin Stålberg, David Lindquist, Göran Hallmans, Kjell Grankvist, Matts Olovsson, Ulf Gyllensten

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Insights into the Relationship between Pentraxin-3 and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Cervical Carcinoma: Oncobiology and Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact ofInternational journal of medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Malin BerggrundFrom the ‡Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab) Uppsala, Box 815, Uppsala University, SE-75108 Uppsala, Sweden.
Stefan EnrothFrom the ‡Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab) Uppsala, Box 815, Uppsala University, SE-75108 Uppsala, Sweden.
Martin Lundberg§OLINK Proteomics, Uppsala Science Park, SE-751 83, Uppsala, Sweden.
Erika Assarsson§OLINK Proteomics, Uppsala Science Park, SE-751 83, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karin StålbergDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, 751 85, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
David LindquistDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden.
Göran HallmansDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Nutritional Research, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden.
Kjell GrankvistDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Clinical Chemistry, Umeå University, SE-90185 Umeå, Sweden.
Matts OlovssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, 751 85, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulf GyllenstenFrom the ‡Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab) Uppsala, Box 815, Uppsala University, SE-75108 Uppsala, Sweden;. Electronic address: ulf.gyllensten@igp.uu.se.
Umeå University · SEUppsala University · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is recommended as the primary test in cervical cancer screening, with co-testing by cytology for HPV-positive women to identify cervical lesions. Cytology has low sensitivity and there is a need to identify biomarkers that could identify dysplasia that are likely to progress to cancer. We searched for plasma proteins that could identify women with cervical cancer using the multiplex proximity extension assay (PEA). The abundance of 100 proteins were measured in plasma collected at the time of diagnosis of patients with invasive cervical cancer and in population controls using the Olink Multiplex panels CVD II, INF I, and ONC II. Eighty proteins showed increased levels in cases compared with controls. We identified a signature of 11 proteins (PTX3, ITGB1BP2, AXIN1, STAMPB, SRC, SIRT2, 4E-BP1, PAPPA, HB-EGF, NEMO and IL27) that distinguished cases and controls with a sensitivity of 0.96 at a specificity of 1.0. This signature was evaluated in a prospective replication cohort with samples collected before, at or after diagnosis and achieved a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity 0.56 separating samples collected at the time of diagnosis of invasive cancer from samples collected prior to diagnosis. No difference in abundance was seen between samples collected prior to diagnosis or after treatment as compared with population controls, indicating that this protein signature is mainly informative close to time of diagnosis. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal window in time prior to diagnosis for these biomarker candidates.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiological AssayBiomarkers, TumorBlood ProteinsFemaleGenetic VariationHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisROC CurveUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorBlood ProteinsBlood*Cancer biomarker(s)Cervical cancerClinical proteomicsHuman PapillomavirusPersonalized medicineScreening

Identifiers

PMID30692274
PMCPMC6442356
OpenAlexW2913531263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.