ArticleBioscience reports2019
Using nomograms to predict prognostic factors in young colorectal mucinous and signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma patients.
Article in Bioscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of risk factors, prognosis, and management of colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Individualized prediction of conditional survival for colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- A novel log odds of positive lymph nodes-based nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma: a SEER population-based study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Construction and validation a nomogram to predict overall survival for colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- "High Tumor Burden" in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Defining the Concept.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the prognosis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder.Bioscience reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to insufficient quantitative evaluation of the clinic-pathological features and prognosis of young colorectal cancer (CRC) with mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) and signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRC), the aim of our study was to develop a nomogram to identify the prognostic predictors for overall survival (OS) in this patient population. We retrospectively evaluated the patient records of MAC and SRC patients aged ≤ 40 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing were performed to estimate OS. A nomogram predicting OS was created for risk quantitation and decision tree analysis was performed for patient grouping. With a median follow-up of 36.5 months, we included a total of 90 young CRC patients for analysis. The overall cumulate 5-year OS rate was 57.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 45.1-68.5%). The estimated 5-year OS was 62.9% (95% CI: 48.5-74.3%) for MAC and 37.3% (95% CI: 14.4-61.2%) for SRC (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.