Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30692225›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

An Essential Role of the Intraparietal Sulcus in Response Inhibition Predicted by Parcellation-Based Network.

Takahiro Osada, Shinri Ohta, Akitoshi Ogawa, Masaki Tanaka, Akimitsu Suda, Koji Kamagata, Masaaki Hori, Shigeki Aoki, Yasushi Shimo, Nobutaka Hattori and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Electrophysiological features of signals recorded from white matter.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dissecting the Causal Role of Early Inferior Frontal Activation in Reading.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Takahiro OsadaDepartments of Neurophysiology.ORCID 0000-0002-3743-3200
Shinri OhtaDepartments of Neurophysiology.
Akitoshi OgawaDepartments of Neurophysiology.
Masaki TanakaDepartments of Neurophysiology.
Akimitsu SudaDepartments of Neurophysiology.
Koji KamagataRadiology.
Masaaki HoriRadiology.ORCID 0000-0002-1791-8032
Shigeki AokiRadiology.
Yasushi ShimoNeurology.
Nobutaka HattoriNeurology.ORCID 0000-0002-2034-2556
Takahiro ShimizuDepartment of Neurology, Tottori University School of Medicine, Tottori 683-8503, Japan, and.
Hiroyuki EnomotoDepartment of Neurology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Ritsuko HanajimaDepartment of Neurology, Tottori University School of Medicine, Tottori 683-8503, Japan, and.
Yoshikazu UgawaDepartment of Neurology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8016-152X
Seiki KonishiDepartments of Neurophysiology, skonishi@juntendo.ac.jp.
Neurology, Inc · USFukushima Medical University · JPTottori University · JPJuntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) features close anatomical and functional relationships with the prefrontal cortex. However, the necessity of the PPC in executive functions has been questioned. The present study used the stop-signal task to examine response inhibition, an executive function that inhibits prepotent response tendency. The brain activity and resting-state functional connectivity were measured to analyze a parcellation-based network that was aimed at identifying a candidate PPC region essential for response inhibition in humans. The intraparietal sulcus (IPS) was activated during response inhibition and connected with the inferior frontal cortex and the presupplementary motor area, the two frontal regions known to be necessary for response inhibition. Next, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to test the essential role of the IPS region for response inhibition. TMS over the IPS region prolonged the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), the standard behavioral index used to evaluate stopping performance, when stimulation was applied 30-0 ms before stopping. On the contrary, stimulation over the temporoparietal junction region, an area activated during response inhibition but lacking connectivity with the two frontal regions, did not show changes in SSRT. These results indicate that the IPS identified using the parcellation-based network plays an essential role in executive functions.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultBrain MappingExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysParietal LobeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultcortical parcellationexecutive functionposterior parietal cortexresponse inhibitiontranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30692225
PMCPMC6435821
OpenAlexW2913827624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.