Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30692079›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Impacts of Brexit on fruit and vegetable intake and cardiovascular disease in England: a modelling study.

Paraskevi Seferidi, Anthony A Laverty, Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard, Piotr Bandosz, Brendan Collins, Maria Guzman-Castillo, Simon Capewell, Martin O'Flaherty, Christopher Millett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paraskevi SeferidiPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3966-3314
Anthony A LavertyPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jonathan Pearson-StuttardPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Piotr BandoszDepartment of Public Health & Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Brendan CollinsDepartment of Public Health & Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Maria Guzman-CastilloDepartment of Public Health & Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Simon CapewellDepartment of Public Health & Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Martin O'FlahertyDepartment of Public Health & Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Christopher MillettPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0900847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the potential impacts of different Brexit trade policy scenarios on the price and intake of fruits and vegetables (F&V) and consequent cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths in England between 2021 and 2030.

designEconomic and epidemiological modelling study with probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

settingThe model combined publicly available data on F&V trade, published estimates of UK-specific price elasticities, national survey data on F&V intake, estimates on the relationship between F&V intake and CVD from published meta-analyses and CVD mortality projections for 2021-2030.

participantsEnglish adults aged 25 years and older.

interventionsWe modelled four potential post-Brexit trade scenarios: (1) free trading agreement with the EU and maintaining half of non-EU free trade partners; (2) free trading agreement with the EU but no trade deal with any non-EU countries; (3) no-deal Brexit; and (4) liberalised trade regime that eliminates all import tariffs. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cumulative coronary heart disease and stroke deaths attributed to the different Brexit scenarios modelled between 2021 and 2030.

resultsUnder all Brexit scenarios modelled, prices of F&V would increase, especially for those highly dependent on imports. This would decrease intake of F&V between 2.5% (95% uncertainty interval: 1.9% to 3.1%) and 11.4% (9.5% to 14.2%) under the different scenarios. Our model suggests that a no-deal Brexit scenario would be the most harmful, generating approximately 12 400 (6690 to 23 390) extra CVD deaths between 2021 and 2030, whereas establishing a free trading agreement with the EU would have a lower impact on mortality, contributing approximately 5740 (2860 to 11 910) extra CVD deaths.

conclusionsTrade policy under all modelled Brexit scenarios could increase price and decrease intake of F&V, generating substantial additional CVD mortality in England. The UK government should consider the population health implications of Brexit trade policy options, including changes to food systems.

Indexed as

DietFruitVegetablesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesCommerceEuropean UnionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalNutrition PolicyPublic Healthbrexitcardiovascular diseasedietfruits and vegetablestrade policy

Identifiers

PMID30692079
PMCPMC6352794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.