Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30692054›Full record

ArticleDisability and health journal2019

Pregnancy course, infant outcomes, rehospitalization, and mortality among women with intellectual disability.

Beth A Mueller, Deborah Crane, David R Doody, Sally N Stuart, Melissa A Schiff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and health journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Beth A MuellerPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: bmueller@fredhutch.org.
Deborah CraneDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
David R DoodyPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sally N StuartCenter on Human Development and Disability, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Melissa A SchiffDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Disabilities: Exploratory ResearchR21HD073024 · NICHD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MUELLER, BETH A · 2013 to 2014
$480k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD073024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women with intellectual disability (ID) may have greater levels of comorbidity and decreased care access, social support, or ability to monitor their status and communicate needs, but few studies have examined their pregnancy course and outcome, and little is known about their longer-term maternal and infant health.

objectiveWe compared pre-pregnancy characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and rehospitalization <2 years after delivery among women with and without ID.

methodWe identified all women with ID and randomly selected a 10:1 comparison group of women without ID with singleton live birth deliveries in Washington State population-based linked birth-hospital discharge data 1987-2012. Multivariable regressions estimated adjusted odds ratios comparing pre-pregnancy characteristics. In cohort analyses, we estimated relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes.

resultsWomen with ID (N = 103) more often had gestational diabetes (RR 3.39, 95% CI 1.81-6.37), preeclampsia (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.03-3.42), and inadequate prenatal care (RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.67-3.70). Their infants more often were small for gestational age (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.10-2.89). Need for rehospitalization postpartum was not increased among women with ID or their infants.

conclusionReasons for increased preeclampsia and gestational diabetes among pregnant women with ID are unclear. Barriers to inadequate prenatal care are multifactorial and warrant further study, with consideration that wellness during pregnancy and other times involves social, familial and clinical support systems responsive to each woman's needs.

Indexed as

Infant DeathPregnancy OutcomePregnant PeopleAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntellectual DisabilityMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPersons with DisabilitiesPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsCohort studyEpidemiologyIntellectual disabilityPregnancy outcomeVital records

Identifiers

PMID30692054
PMCPMC6581578
OpenAlexW2909950535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.