Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30691968›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2019

Awake Mouse Imaging: From Two-Photon Microscopy to Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Michèle Desjardins, Kıvılcım Kılıç, Martin Thunemann, Celine Mateo, Dominic Holland, Christopher G L Ferri, Jonathan A Cremonesi, Baoqiang Li, Qun Cheng, Kimberly L Weldy and 14 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Where do we stand on fMRI in awake mice?Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. High-resolution awake mouse fMRI at 14 Tesla.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Contribution of Intravital Neuroimaging to Study Animal Models of Multiple Sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Michèle DesjardinsDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: michele.desjardins@phy.ulaval.ca.
Kıvılcım KılıçDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Martin ThunemannDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Celine MateoDepartment of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Dominic HollandDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Christopher G L FerriDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Jonathan A CremonesiBiology Undergraduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Baoqiang LiMartinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown.
Qun ChengDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Kimberly L WeldyDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Payam A SaisanDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
David KleinfeldDepartment of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Section of Neurobiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Takaki KomiyamaDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Section of Neurobiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Thomas T LiuDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Robert BussellDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Eric C WongDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Miriam ScadengDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Andrew K DunnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
David A BoasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sava SakadžićMartinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown.
Joseph B MandevilleMartinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown.
Richard B BuxtonDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Anders M DaleDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Anna DevorDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown.
University of California San Diego · USHarvard University · USAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USBoston University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Targeting ROCK for Neurogliovascular Plasticity & Remodeling After StrokeP01NS055104 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LO, ENG H. · 2007 to 2018
$13.3M
MICROSCOPIC FOUNDATION OF MULTIMODAL HUMAN IMAGINGR01MH111359 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DALE, ANDERS M, DEVOR, ANNA · 2016 to 2020
$5.6M
The impact of microvascular (dys)regulation on cerebral flow and oxygen heterogeneityR01NS108472 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI BOAS, DAVID A, SCHAFFER, CHRIS B · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Neuronal, glial and BOLD fMRI signals: From BOLD to 2-photon microscopyR01NS057198 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DEVOR, ANNA · 2009 to 2017
$2.6M
Two-Photon Microscopy of Oxygen Consumption in the BrainR01NS091230 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SAKADZIC, SAVA · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
Non-degenerate multiphoton microscopy for deep brain imagingU01NS094232 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DEVOR, ANNA, FAINMAN, YESHAIAHU L · 2015 to 2017
$1.3M
Multiphoton imaging and uncaging system with a capability of simultaneous electroS10RR029050 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DALE, ANDERS M · 2010 to 2010
$870k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029050NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111359NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS055104NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057198NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091230NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS108472NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS094232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in awake behaving mice is well positioned to bridge the detailed cellular-level view of brain activity, which has become available owing to recent advances in microscopic optical imaging and genetics, to the macroscopic scale of human noninvasive observables. However, though microscopic (e.g., two-photon imaging) studies in behaving mice have become a reality in many laboratories, awake mouse fMRI remains a challenge. Owing to variability in behavior among animals, performing all types of measurements within the same subject is highly desirable and can lead to higher scientific rigor.

methodsWe demonstrated blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI in awake mice implanted with long-term cranial windows that allowed optical access for microscopic imaging modalities and optogenetic stimulation. We started with two-photon imaging of single-vessel diameter changes (n = 1). Next, we implemented intrinsic optical imaging of blood oxygenation and flow combined with laser speckle imaging of blood flow obtaining a mesoscopic picture of the hemodynamic response (n = 16). Then we obtained corresponding blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI data (n = 5). All measurements could be performed in the same mice in response to identical sensory and optogenetic stimuli.

resultsThe cranial window did not deteriorate the quality of fMRI and allowed alternation between imaging modalities in each subject.

conclusionsThis report provides a proof of feasibility for multiscale imaging approaches in awake mice. In the future, this protocol could be extended to include complex cognitive behaviors translatable to humans, such as sensory discrimination or attention.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceNeuroimagingOptical ImagingOptogeneticsSomatosensory CortexWakefulnessBlood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) signalCerebral blood flowfMRIIntrinsic optical signalsOptogeneticTwo-photon microscopy

Identifiers

PMID30691968
PMCPMC6556427
OpenAlexW2905138852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.