Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30691545›Full record

ReviewJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2019

The Neuropsychological Syndrome of Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum.

Warren S Brown, Lynn K Paul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How does the subjective well-being of Australian adults with a congenital corpus callosum disorder compare with that of the general Australian population?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The corpus callosum and creativity revisited.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Warren S Brown1Fuller Graduate School of Psychology,Travis Research Institute,Pasadena,California.
Lynn K Paul2California Institute of Technology,Division of Humanities and Social Sciences,Pasadena,California.

Funding

Early Development in Agenesis of the Corpus CallosumR01HD092430 · NICHD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PAUL, LYNN KERLIN · 2018 to 2022
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgenesis of the corpus callosum (AgCC) involves congenital absence of all or part of the corpus callosum. Because the disorder can only be firmly diagnosed via neuroradiology, it has a short research history, and only recently has the cognitive syndrome become clear. PURPOSE: Our purpose is to review the primary deficits in AgCC that constitute the core syndrome.

conclusionsThe cores syndrome includes: (1) reduced interhemispheric transfer of sensory-motor information; (2) reduced cognitive processing speed; and (3) deficits in complex reasoning and novel problem-solving. These domains do not appear to reflect different neuroanatomical abnormalities, but rather different domains of expression of reduced interhemispheric communication from callosal absence. IMPLICATIONS: These core deficits are expressed across various domains of cognitive, behavioral, and social functioning. The impact of these deficits varies across development and may be moderated by individual factors such as co-occurrence of other neurodevelopmental conditions, general intellectual capacity, and environmental support. (JINS, 2019, 25, 324-330).

Indexed as

Agenesis of Corpus CallosumCognitive DysfunctionHumansAgenesis of the corpus callosumCorpus callosum

Identifiers

PMID30691545
PMCPMC7989584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.