Correspondence on Curran et al. (2018): 'Which biological and self-report measures of cannabis use predict cannabis dependency and acute psychotic-like effects'.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

1. The Anticipated Effects of Cannabis Scale (AECS): Initial development and validation of an affect- and valence-based expectancy measure.Psychological assessment · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Reply to Vadhan et al. - Correspondence on Curran et al. (2018) 'Which biological and self-report measures of cannabis use predict cannabis dependency and acute psychotic-like response'.2019
• Comment on
  Which biological and self-report measures of cannabis use predict cannabis dependency and acute psychotic-like effects?2019

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as