ArticlePsychological medicine2020
Comparing proxy rated quality of life of people living with dementia in care homes.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Understanding the influence of different proxy perspectives in explaining the difference between self-rated and proxy-rated quality of life in people living with dementia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Pooled it
- Exploring self-report and proxy-report quality-of-life measures for people living with dementia in care homes.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020Trial
- Clinical, social, and home-level factors associated with the quality of life of residents living with dementia in Canadian nursing homes: a cross-sectional, multi-province study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Article
- National survey of older people's community mental health teams in England.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- Proxy reporting in health: a scoping review of instructions, perspectives, and reporting experiences.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Appropriateness of the EQ-HWB for Use in Residential Aged Care: A Proxy Perspective.The patient · 2024Article
- Counting what counts: assessing quality of life and its social determinants among nursing home residents with dementia.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Nursing staff's experiences of how weighted blankets influence resident's in nursing homes expressions of health.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2022Article
- Experiences of Assistive Products and Home Care among Older Clients with and without Dementia in Sweden.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Exploring changes to resident thriving and associated factors in Swedish nursing homes: A repeated cross-sectional study.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2022Article
- Article
- Feasibility and validity of EQ-5D-5L proxy by nurses in measuring health-related quality of life of nursing home residents.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Recognizing expressions of thriving among persons living in nursing homes: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2021Article
- Quality of life and factors affecting it in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Article
- Italian pilot version of DEMOQL-PROXY: Content and Face validity: a methodological bridge for a future Italian validation.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2020Article
- Assessing social connection for long-term care home residents: Systematic review using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Review
- Managers' Perspectives of Quality of Care in Service Housing and Home Care Services: A Qualitative Study.Gerontology & geriatric medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImproving quality of life (QOL) for people with dementia is a priority. In care homes, we often rely on proxy ratings from staff and family but we do not know if, or how, they differ in care homes.
methodsWe compared 1056 pairs of staff and family DEMQOL-Proxy ratings from 86 care homes across England. We explored factors associated with ratings quantitatively using multilevel modelling and, qualitatively, through thematic analysis of 12 staff and 12 relative interviews.
resultsStaff and family ratings were weakly correlated (ρs = 0.35). Median staff scores were higher than family's (104 v. 101; p < 0.001). Family were more likely than staff to rate resident QOL as 'Poor' (χ2 = 55.91, p < 0.001). Staff and family rated QOL higher when residents had fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms and severe dementia. Staff rated QOL higher in homes with lower staff:resident ratios and when staff were native English speakers. Family rated QOL higher when the resident had spent longer living in the care home and was a native English. Spouses rated residents' QOL higher than other relatives. Qualitative results suggest differences arise because staff felt good care provided high QOL but families compared the present to the past. Family judgements centre on loss and are complicated by decisions about care home placement and their understandings of dementia.
conclusionProxy reports differ systematically between staff and family. Reports are influenced by the rater:staff and family may conceptualise QOL differently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.