Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30691506›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2019

The effect of malaria rapid diagnostic tests results on antimicrobial prescription practices of health care workers in Burkina Faso.

Massa Dit Achille Bonko, Francois Kiemde, Marc Christian Tahita, Palpouguini Lompo, Athanase M Some, Halidou Tinto, Michael Boele van Hensbroek, Petra F Mens, Henk D F H Schallig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Assessment of the Prioritization of Diagnostics in National Action Plans for Antimicrobial Resistance.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Perspective on the Integration of Diagnostic Algorithms for Fever Management.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Diagnostic Performance ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Massa Dit Achille BonkoInstitut de Recherche en Science de la Sante-Unite de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Francois KiemdeInstitut de Recherche en Science de la Sante-Unite de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Nanoro, Burkina Faso. kiemdefrancois@yahoo.fr.
Marc Christian TahitaInstitut de Recherche en Science de la Sante-Unite de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Palpouguini LompoInstitut de Recherche en Science de la Sante-Unite de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Athanase M SomeInstitut de Recherche en Science de la Sante-Unite de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Halidou TintoInstitut de Recherche en Science de la Sante-Unite de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Michael Boele van HensbroekGlobal Child Health Group, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Petra F MensParasitology Unit, Department of Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk D F H SchalligParasitology Unit, Department of Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) project 205300005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) are widely used in endemic areas in order to comply with the recommendation that malaria treatment should only be given after the clinical diagnosis has been confirmed by RDT or microscopy. However, the overestimation of malaria infection with the use of PfHRP2 based RDT, makes the management of febrile illnesses more challenging. This study aimed to assess the effect of the use of malaria RDT on antimicrobial prescription practices.

methodsA prospective study was conducted among febrile children under-5 years of age attending four health facilities and the referral hospital in the Nanoro Health District (Burkina Faso). To assess the effect of malaria RDT testing on the prescriptions of antimicrobials in febrile children, the initial diagnosis and antimicrobial prescriptions following a malaria RDT testing were recorded. The necessity of these prescriptions was subsequently checked by assessing the actual cause of fever by expert malaria microscopy and a microbiology analysis of blood, urine, stool and nasopharynx swabs that were collected from febrile cases to determine the actual cause of the fever episode.

resultsMalaria was diagnosed by nurses, who are the primary health care providers, with a malaria RDT in 72.7% (798/1098) of febrile children, but only 53.7% (589/1097) cases could be confirmed by expert microscopy. Health care workers were likely to prescribe antimalarials to malaria positive RDT compared to malaria negative RDT (RR = 7.74, p = 0.00001). Malaria negative RDT result had a significant influence on the antibiotic prescriptions (RR = 3.57, p = 0.0001). The risk of prescribing antimicrobials was higher in health facility level compared to referral hospital. By cross-checking of laboratory findings to antimicrobial prescriptions, an important part of children with positive bacterial infection have received antibiotic prescriptions although the majority without any infection have also received antibiotics.

conclusionDespite the good attitude of health care workers to adhere to diagnostic test results, antimalarials and antibiotics remain inappropriate prescribed to febrile children. The low specificity of malaria RDT used could be an important cause of these practices.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelAntigens, ProtozoanAntimalarialsBurkina FasoChildChild, PreschoolDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDrug PrescriptionsFemaleFeverHealth FacilitiesHumansMalariaMalaria, FalciparumMaleMicroscopyAntigens, ProtozoanAntimalarialsHRP-2 antigen, Plasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsAntibioticAntimicrobialBacteria and parasitesFeverMalariaPrescription

Identifiers

PMID30691506
PMCPMC6348635
OpenAlexW2922224790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.