Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30691480›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2019

Study protocol: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge trial of tailored support for implementing social determinants of health documentation/action in community health centers, with realist evaluation.

Rachel Gold, Arwen Bunce, Erika Cottrell, Miguel Marino, Mary Middendorf, Stuart Cowburn, Dagan Wright, Ned Mossman, Katie Dambrun, Byron J Powell and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03607617 completednot on this map

ASCEND: ApproacheS to CHC ImplEmeNtation of SDH Data Collection and Action

TypeobservationalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2018 to 2023Enrolled31ConditionsDiabetes MellitusArmsSDH Tool
NCT05968716 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Addressing Unmet Social Needs Among Hospitalized Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2023 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsSocial Needs Screening, Caregiver-care Team Relationships, Social Needs Status, Child Health StatusArmsSocial needs screening protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review of Electronic Community Resource Referral Systems.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The role of behavioral science in addressing cardiovascular health disparities: A narrative review of efforts, challenges, and future directions.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel GoldKaiser Permanente-Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, USA. rachel.gold@kpchr.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6326-5012
Arwen BunceOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Erika CottrellOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Miguel MarinoOregon Health and Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Mary MiddendorfOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Stuart CowburnOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Dagan WrightOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Ned MossmanOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Katie DambrunOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Byron J PowellUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1105C McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.
Inga GrußKaiser Permanente-Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
Laura GottliebUniversity of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Marla DearingOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Jason ScottKaiser Permanente-Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
Nadia YosufKaiser Permanente-Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
Molly KrancariOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Ochin · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

ASCEND: ApproacheS to CHC ImplEmeNtation of SDH Data Collection and ActionR18DK114701 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GOLD, RACHEL · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
IMPROVING THE IMPLEMENTATION AND SUSTAINMENT OF EBPS IN MENTAL HEALTH: DEVELOPING AND PILOTING THE COLLABORATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL APPROACH TO SELECTING AND TAILORING IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES (COAST-ISK01MH113806 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, BYRON JAMES · 2017 to 2020
$697k
NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK114701NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH113806NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH108060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational leaders recommend documenting social determinants of health and actions taken to address social determinants of health in electronic health records, and a growing body of evidence suggests the health benefits of doing so. However, little evidence exists to guide implementation of social determinants of health documentation/action.

methodsThis paper describes a 5-year, mixed-methods, stepped-wedge trial with realist evaluation, designed to test the impact of providing 30 community health centers with step-by-step guidance on implementing electronic health record-based social determinants of health documentation. This guidance will entail 6 months of tailored support from an interdisciplinary team, including training and technical assistance. We will report on tailored support provided at each of five implementation steps; impact of tailored implementation support; a method for tracking such tailoring; and context-specific pathways through which these tailored strategies effect change. We will track the competencies and resources needed to support the study clinics' implementation efforts. DISCUSSION: Results will inform how to tailor implementation strategies to meet local needs in real-world practice settings. Secondary analyses will assess impacts of social determinants of health documentation and referral-making on diabetes outcomes. By learning whether and how scalable, tailored implementation strategies help community health centers adopt social determinants of health documentation and action, this study will yield timely guidance to primary care providers. We are not aware of previous studies exploring implementation strategies that support adoption of social determinants of action using electronic health and interventions, despite the pressing need for such guidance.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03607617 , registration date: 7/31/2018-retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsSocial Determinants of HealthSocial SupportAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisCommunity Health CentersData CollectionDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansImplementation ScienceInfantCommunity health centersElectronic health recordsImplementationImplementation strategiesSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID30691480
PMCPMC6348649
OpenAlexW2915785250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.