Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30691421›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2019

Effectiveness of a self-management training for patients with chronic and treatment resistant anxiety or depressive disorders on quality of life, symptoms, and empowerment: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Maringa H H Zoun, Bauke Koekkoek, Henny Sinnema, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis, Anton J L M van Balkom, Aart H Schene, Filip Smit, Jan Spijker

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maringa H H ZounBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9104, 6500, HE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. m.zoun@propersona.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9362-9566
Bauke KoekkoekPro Persona Mental Health Care, Wolfheze 2, 6874 BE, Wolfheze, The Netherlands.
Henny SinnemaInstitute for Nursing Studies, HU University of Applied Sciences, Heidelberglaan 7, 3584, CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christina M van der Feltz-CornelisTop Clinical Centre for Body, Mind and Health, GGZ Breburg, Lage Witsiebaan 4, 5042, DA, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Anton J L M van BalkomDepartment of Psychiatry and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Centre and GGZ inGeest, Oldenaller 1, 1081, HJ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aart H ScheneDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Filip SmitDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, VU University Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan SpijkerBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9104, 6500, HE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety and depressive disorders are common mental disorders. A substantial part of patients does not achieve symptomatic remission after treatment in specialized services. Current care as usual (CAU) for these patients consists of long-term supportive contacts. Termination of CAU is often not considered to be an option due to persistent symptoms, a low level of functioning, and the absence of further treatment options. A new intervention, ZemCAD, offers a program focused on rehabilitation and self-management, followed by referral back to primary care.

methodsThis multicenter randomized controlled trial was carried out in twelve specialized outpatient mental health care services in the Netherlands. Consenting and eligible patients were invited for the MINI interview and the baseline questionnaire. Assessments were done at 6 (T1), 12 (T2) and 18 (T3) months post baseline. We used linear mixed model analysis (LMM) to ascertain the effectiveness of the ZemCAD group relative to the CAU group on quality of life, symptom severity and empowerment.

resultsIn total 141 patients were included. The results at 18-month follow-up regarding to quality of life and symptom severity, showed no significant differences between the ZemCAD group and the CAU group, except on the 'social relationships'-domain (d = 0.37). With regard to empowerment a significant difference between both groups was observed in the total empowerment score and one empowerment dimension (d = 0.45 and d = 0.39, respectively). After the ZemCAD intervention, more patients went from specialized outpatient mental health services back to a less specialized health care setting with less intensive treatment, such as primary care.

conclusionThe findings in this study suggest that patients with chronic and treatment-resistant anxiety and depression using the ZemCAD intervention improve on empowerment but not on symptom severity or quality of life. Since little is known about the effects of rehabilitation and self-management in patients with chronic and treatment resistant anxiety and depressive disorders, this is a first attempt to provide a proof-of-concept study in this under-researched but important field.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register: NTR3335 , registered 7 March 2012.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPower, PsychologicalAdultAgedAmbulatory CareAnxiety DisordersChronic DiseaseDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsQuality of LifeSelf-ManagementAnxietyChronicDepressionPrimary careRandomized controlled trialSelf-managementSpecialized outpatient mental health careTreatment resistant

Identifiers

PMID30691421
PMCPMC6348638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.