ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019
A review of surrogate motherhood regulation in south American countries: pointing to a need for an international legal framework.
Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surrogacy from a reproductive rights and justice perspective: a narrative review.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Review
- [Illegal yet ongoing: surrogacy through the moral prism of urban Chinese women in Nanjing].Salud colectiva · 2026Article
- Psychological challenges of distance parenting among young working mothers.Discover mental health · 2025Article
- The Fertility Market in Latin America and Brazil: A Narrative Review of Trends and Key Players.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2025Review
- 20 Years Since the Enactment of Italian Law No. 40/2004 on Medically Assisted Procreation: How It Has Changed and How It Could Change.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Legal protections forFrontiers in reproductive health · 2025Review
- Mapping the path to domestic surrogacy: Identifying key facilitators and barriers in the Netherlands.PloS one · 2025Article
- Permanently infertile couples and family building-a cross-sectional survey in Denmark.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Navigating the gestational surrogacy seas: the legalities and complexities of gestational carrier services.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Stem Cells and Infertility: A Review of Clinical Applications and Legal Frameworks.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Commercial Surrogacy: An Overview.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022Review
- A reproductive health-care program for surrogate mothers: A mixed methods study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
- The need for regulation in the practice of human assisted reproduction in Mexico. An overview of the regulations in the rest of the world.Reproductive health · 2021Review
- Surrogacy and "Procreative Tourism". What Does the Future Hold from the Ethical and Legal Perspectives?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- The social paradoxes of commercial surrogacy in developing countries: India before the new law of 2018.BMC women's health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in science and technology coupled with globalization are changing access to and utilization of reproductive health services. This includes the transnational phenomenon of families who use surrogate mothers to reproduce, with forms of altruistic and commercial surrogacy becoming more commonplace. Simultaneously, changes in law, regulation, and policy are necessary to protect surrogates, intended parents, and resulting children. These developments have been slow to adapt to challenges inherent to surrogacy arrangements, most specifically in low-and middle-income countries, including in South American countries.
methodsWe conducted an interdisciplinary non-systematic literature review and legal analysis of existing and pending policy, laws, and regulations related to commercial surrogacy arrangements in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela. The review focused on articles that discussed topics of domestic and international law, policy, regulation, and governance related to commercial surrogacy. We queried PubMed, JSTOR, and Google Scholar for Spanish and English-language articles limited to those published between 2000 and 2016.
resultsOur literature and legal review found a wide variance in how different countries address the issue, including two (Brazil and Uruguay) that have issued guidance attempting to clarify the legality of commercial surrogacy, others who have introduced surrogacy-specific legislation, and a final group with no specific legal mechanisms in place. Our extracted legal case studies also indicate that courts have a hard time interpreting existing law and its applicability to surrogacy. The influence of Catholicism also played a role in the adoption of surrogacy and other advanced reproductive technology (ART)-related legislation.
conclusionsChanges in global infertility rates, the emergence of new family structures, and advancement of ART are factors that will influence future development of legal frameworks addressing surrogacy in South America. Despite a growing transnational market for commercial surrogacy in many of the countries examined, the current patchwork of policy does little to clarify what forms of surrogacy are legally permissible, nor do they adequately protect surrogates, intended parents, or the children themselves. This points to an urgent need for regional legal and policy harmonization specifically designed to align with public health and human rights principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.