Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30691334›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Discharge Heart Rate After Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction and Long-Term Mortality in 2 US Registries.

Venkatesh Alapati, Fengming Tang, Esti Charlap, Paul S Chan, Paul A Heidenreich, Philip G Jones, John A Spertus, Vankeepuram Srinivas, Jorge R Kizer

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Venkatesh Alapati1 New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital Brooklyn NY.
Fengming Tang2 Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO.
Esti Charlap3 Northwell Health New Hyde Park NY.
Paul S Chan2 Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO.
Paul A Heidenreich4 Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System and Stanford School of Medicine Palo Alto CA.
Philip G Jones2 Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO.
John A Spertus2 Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO.
Vankeepuram Srinivas5 Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx NY.
Jorge R Kizer6 San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System and University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA.
Saint Luke's Hospital · USMontefiore Medical Center · USNewYork–Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital · USNorthwell Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

Advanced Glycation Endproducts and Cardio-Renal DiseaseK24HL135413 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KIZER, JORGE R · 2017 to 2021
$606k
RISK-ADJUSTMENT OF 1-YEAR HEALTH STATUS OUTCOMES IN CADR01HS011282 · AHRQ · SAINT LUKE'S HOSPITAL · PI SPERTUS, JOHN A · 2000 to 2003
–
AHRQ HHS R01 HS011282NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL135413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Although admission heart rate predicts higher mortality after acute myocardial infarction ( AMI ), less is known about discharge heart rate. We tested the hypothesis that higher discharge heart rate after AMI is related to increased long-term mortality independent of admission heart rate, and assessed whether β blockers modify this relationship. Methods and Results In 2 prospective US multicenter registries of AMI , we evaluated the associations of discharge and admission heart rate with 3-year mortality using Cox models. Among 6576 patients with AMI , discharge heart rate was modestly associated with initial heart rate ( r=0.28), comorbidities, and infarct severity. In this cohort, 10.7% did not receive β blockers at discharge. After full adjustment for demographic, psychosocial, and clinical covariates, discharge heart rate (hazard ratio [HR]=1.14 per 10 beats per minute [bpm]; 95% CI =1.07-1.21 per 10 bpm) was more strongly associated with risk of death than admission heart rate (HR=1.05 per 10 bpm; 95% CI=1.02-1.09 per 10 bpm) when both were entered in the same model ( P=0.043 for comparison). There was a significant interaction between discharge heart rate and β-blocker use ( P=0.004) on mortality, wherein risk of death was markedly higher among those with high discharge heart rate and not on β blockers (HR=1.35 per 10 bpm; 95% CI=1.19-1.53 per 10 bpm) versus those with a high discharge heart rate and on β blockers at discharge (HR=1.10 per 10 bpm; 95% CI=1.03-1.17 per 10 bpm). Conclusions Higher discharge heart rate after AMI was more strongly associated with 3-year mortality than admission heart rate, and the risk associated with higher discharge heart rate was modified by β blockers at discharge. These findings highlight opportunities for risk stratification and intervention that will require further investigation.

Indexed as

RegistriesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPatient DischargeProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival RateTime FactorsUnited Statesdischargemortalitymyocardial infarctionβ blocker

Identifiers

PMID30691334
PMCPMC6405572
OpenAlexW2914300864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.