ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Investigating EEG Patterns for Dual-Stimuli Induced Human Fear Emotional State.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for EEG Feature Extraction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Spatial Visual Imagery (SVI)-Based Electroencephalograph Discrimination for Natural CAD Manipulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Application of artificial intelligence for automatic cataract staging based on anterior segment images: comparing automatic segmentation approaches to manual segmentation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Multi-Classifier Fusion Based on MI-SFFS for Cross-Subject Emotion Recognition.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Fusion of EEG-Based Activation, Spatial, and Connection Patterns for Fear Emotion Recognition.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Comparing Neural Correlates of Human Emotions across Multiple Stimulus Presentation Paradigms.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Characterization of Industry 4.0 Lean Management Problem-Solving Behavioral Patterns Using EEG Sensors and Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Fear Level Classification Based on Emotional Dimensions and Machine Learning Techniques.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most electroencephalography (EEG) based emotion recognition systems make use of videos and images as stimuli. Few used sounds, and even fewer studies were found involving self-induced emotions. Furthermore, most of the studies rely on single stimuli to evoke emotions. The question of "whether different stimuli for same emotion elicitation generate any subject-independent correlations" remains unanswered. This paper introduces a dual modality based emotion elicitation paradigm to investigate if emotions can be classified induced with different stimuli. A method has been proposed based on common spatial pattern (CSP) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to analyze human brain signals for fear emotions evoked with two different stimuli. Self-induced emotional imagery is one of the considered stimuli, while audio/video clips are used as the other stimuli. The method extracts features from the CSP algorithm and LDA performs classification. To investigate associated EEG correlations, a spectral analysis was performed. To further improve the performance, CSP was compared with other regularized techniques. Critical EEG channels are identified based on spatial filter weights. To the best of our knowledge, our work provides the first contribution for the assessment of EEG correlations in the case of self versus video induced emotions captured with a commercial grade EEG device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.