Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30691075›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Particulated, Extracted Human Teeth Characterization by SEM⁻EDX Evaluation as a Biomaterial for Socket Preservation: An in vitro Study.

José Luis Calvo-Guirado, Alvaro Ballester-Montilla, Piedad N De Aza, Manuel Fernández-Domínguez, Sergio Alexandre Gehrke, Pilar Cegarra-Del Pino, Lanka Mahesh, André Antonio Pelegrine, Juan Manuel Aragoneses, José Maté-Sánchez de Val

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Multi-modal characterization of rodent tooth development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

José Luis Calvo-GuiradoDepartment of Oral and Implant Surgery. Faculty of Health Sciences. Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, 30002 Murcia, Spain. jlcalvo@ucam.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4067-2253
Alvaro Ballester-MontillaInternational Dentistry Research Cathedra. Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia. aballestermontilla@hotmail.com.
Piedad N De AzaInstitute of Bioengineering, Miguel Hernández University, Elche- Alicante (03203), Spain. piedad@umh.es.ORCID 0000-0001-9316-4407
Manuel Fernández-DomínguezDepartment of Translational Medicine, CEU San Pablo University, 28223 Madrid, Spain. clinferfun@yahoo.es.
Sergio Alexandre GehrkeBiotecnos Research Center-Tecnología e Ciencia Ltda. Montevideo (11800), Uruguay. sergio.gehrke@hotmail.com.
Pilar Cegarra-Del PinoInternational Dentistry Research Cathedra. Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia. pilarcedepi@gmail.com.
Lanka MaheshImplantologist, Private Practice, New Delhi 110002, India. drlanka.mahesh@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0672-9639
André Antonio PelegrineFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic (13024-530), Brazil. andre.pelegrine@slmandic.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0001-7935-1062
Juan Manuel AragonesesDepartment of Dental Research in Universidad Francisco Henríquez y Carvajal, 10107 Santo Domingo, República Dominicana. jmaragoneses@gmail.com.
José Maté-Sánchez de ValDepartment of Oral and Implant Surgery. Faculty of Health Sciences. Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain. jemate@ucam.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1710-8582
Universidad Católica de Murcia · ESFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic · BRUniversidad Federico Henríquez y Carvajal · DOUniversidad San Pablo CEU · ESUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the chemical composition of crushed, extracted human teeth and the quantity of biomaterial that can be obtained from this process. A total of 100 human teeth, extracted due to trauma, decay, or periodontal disease, were analyzed. After extraction, all the teeth were classified, measured, and weighed on a microscale. The human teeth were crushed immediately using the Smart Dentin Grinder machine (KometaBio Inc., Cresskill, NJ, USA), a device specially designed for this procedure. The human tooth particles obtained were of 300⁻1200 microns, obtained by sieving through a special sorting filter, which divided the material into two compartments. The crushed teeth were weighed on a microscale, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation was performed. After processing, 0.25 gr of human teeth produced 1.0 cc of biomaterial. Significant differences in tooth weight were found between the first and second upper molars compared with the lower molars. The chemical composition of the particulate was clearly similar to natural bone. Scanning electron microscopy⁻energy dispersive X-ray (SEM⁻EDX) analysis of the tooth particles obtained mean results of Ca% 23.42 0.34 and P% 9.51 0.11. Pore size distribution curves expressed the interparticle pore range as one small peak at 0.0053 µm. This result is in accordance with helium gas pycnometer findings; the augmented porosity corresponded to interparticle spaces and only 2.533% corresponded to intraparticle porosity. Autogenous tooth particulate biomaterial made from human extracted teeth may be considered a potential material for bone regeneration due to its chemical composition and the quantity obtained. After grinding the teeth, the resulting material increases in quantity by up to three times its original volume, such that two extracted mandibular lateral incisors teeth will provide a sufficient amount of material to fill four empty mandibular alveoli. The tooth particles present intra and extra pores up to 44.48% after pycnometer evaluation in order to increase the blood supply and support slow resorption of the grafted material, which supports healing and replacement resorption to achieve lamellar bone. After SEM⁻EDX evaluation, it appears that calcium and phosphates are still present within the collagen components even after the particle cleaning procedures that are conducted before use.

Indexed as

autogenous particulate dentin graftautologous graftbone graftsground teethhuman teethsmart dentin grindertooth graft

Identifiers

PMID30691075
PMCPMC6384623
OpenAlexW2913620799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.