Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30691027›Full record

ArticleGenes2019

The Cancer Aneuploidy Paradox: In the Light of Evolution.

Kristine Salmina, Anda Huna, Martins Kalejs, Dace Pjanova, Harry Scherthan, Mark S Cragg, Jekaterina Erenpreisa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Tracing Genetic Images Formed During Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Surviving the Storm: The Role of Poly- and Depolyploidization in Tissues and Tumors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Special Issue "Advances in Genome Regulation in Cancer".International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Polyploidy as an Adaptation against Loss of Heterozygosity in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Life Entrapped in a Network of Atavistic Attractors: How to Find a Rescue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Kristine SalminaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, LV1067 Riga, Latvia. salmina.kristine@gmail.com.
Anda HunaCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France. anda.huna@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2030-8865
Martins KalejsRiga Stradins University, LV1007 Riga, Latvia. m.kalejs@gmail.com.
Dace PjanovaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, LV1067 Riga, Latvia. dace@biomed.lu.lv.
Harry ScherthanBundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affil. to the Univ. of Ulm, 80937 Munich, Germany. scherth@web.de.
Mark S CraggCentre for Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. m.s.cragg@soton.ac.uk.
Jekaterina ErenpreisaLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, LV1067 Riga, Latvia. katrina@biomed.lu.lv.ORCID 0000-0002-2870-7775
Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre · LVCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon · FRRiga Stradiņš University · LVUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aneuploidy should compromise cellular proliferation but paradoxically favours tumour progression and poor prognosis. Here, we consider this paradox in terms of our most recent observations of chemo/radio-resistant cells undergoing reversible polyploidy. The latter perform the segregation of two parental groups of end-to-end linked dyads by pseudo-mitosis creating tetraploid cells through a dysfunctional spindle. This is followed by autokaryogamy and a homologous pairing preceding a bi-looped endo-prophase. The associated RAD51 and DMC1/γ-H2AX double-strand break repair foci are tandemly situated on the AURKB/REC8/kinetochore doublets along replicated chromosome loops, indicative of recombination events. MOS-associated REC8-positive peri-nucleolar centromere cluster organises a monopolar spindle. The process is completed by reduction divisions (bi-polar or by radial cytotomy including pedogamic exchanges) and by the release of secondary cells and/or the formation of an embryoid. Together this process preserves genomic integrity and chromosome pairing, while tolerating aneuploidy by by-passing the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Concurrently, it reduces the chromosome number and facilitates recombination that decreases the mutation load of aneuploidy and lethality in the chemo-resistant tumour cells. This cancer life-cycle has parallels both within the cycling polyploidy of the asexual life cycles of ancient unicellular protists and cleavage embryos of early multicellulars, supporting the atavistic theory of cancer.

Indexed as

AneuploidyEvolution, MolecularGenomic InstabilityHeLa CellsHumansKinetochoresMitosisNeoplasmsRecombination, GeneticSpindle Apparatusaneuploidyautokaryogamycancerchromothripsiscleavage embryodisabled spindlemeio-mitosisrecombination on kinetochoresreductionsomatic pairing

Identifiers

PMID30691027
PMCPMC6409809
OpenAlexW2908574340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.