Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30690817›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2019

Utility of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Takuya Koie, Chikara Ohyama, Kazuhide Makiyama, Toru Shimazui, Tomoaki Miyagawa, Kosuke Mizutani, Tomohiro Tsuchiya, Taku Kato, Keita Nakane

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Takuya KoieDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Gifu, Japan.
Chikara OhyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan.
Kazuhide MakiyamaDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Toru ShimazuiDepartment of Urology, Ibaraki Clinical Education and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Kasama, Ibaraki, Japan.
Tomoaki MiyagawaDepatment of Urology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Urawa, Saitama, Japan.
Kosuke MizutaniDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Gifu, Japan.
Tomohiro TsuchiyaDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Gifu, Japan.
Taku KatoDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Gifu, Japan.
Keita NakaneDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Gifu, Japan.
Gifu University · JPHirosaki University · JPJichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

KAKENHI 17K11118KAKENHI 18K0919005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical cystectomy remains the gold standard for treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy has technical advantages over laparoscopic radical cystectomy and has emerged as an alternative to open radical cystectomy. Despite the advancements in robotic surgery, experience with total intracorporeal reconstruction of urinary diversion remains limited. Most surgeons have carried out the hybrid approach of robot-assisted radical cystectomy and extracorporeal reconstruction of urinary diversion, as intracorporeal reconstruction of urinary diversion remains technically challenging. However, intracorporeal reconstruction of urinary diversion might potentially proffer additional benefits, such as decreased fluid loss, reduction in estimated blood loss and a quicker return of bowel function. The adoption of intracorporeal ileal neobladder reconstruction has hitherto been limited to high-volume academic institutions. In the present review, we compare the totally intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy approach with open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted radical cystectomy + extracorporeal reconstruction of urinary diversion in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalCystectomyDiseaseHospital MortalityHumansIleumKaplan-Meier EstimateMargins of ExcisionNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Diversionintracorporeal urinary diversionmuscle-invasive bladder cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapyradical cystectomyrobot-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID30690817
PMCPMC6850512
OpenAlexW2911435511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.