Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30690607›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2019

Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in broilers challenged with a multi-resistant E. coli strain and received ampicillin, an organic acid-based feed additive or a synbiotic preparation.

Nataliya Roth, Charles Hofacre, Ulrike Zitz, Greg F Mathis, Karl Moder, Barbara Doupovec, Roy Berghouse, Konrad J Domig

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Effects ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The GenusAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nataliya RothDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Institute of Food Science, BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Charles HofacreDepartment of Population Health, Poultry Diagnostics and Research Center, University of Georgia, 30602 Athens, Georgia, USA.
Ulrike ZitzDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Institute of Food Science, BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Greg F MathisDepartment of Population Health, Poultry Diagnostics and Research Center, University of Georgia, 30602 Athens, Georgia, USA.
Karl ModerInstitute of Applied Statistics and Computing, BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Barbara DoupovecBIOMIN Holding GmbH, 3131 Getzersdorf, Austria.
Roy BerghouseSouthern Poultry Research Group, Inc. 30607-3153 Athens, Georgia, USA.
Konrad J DomigDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Institute of Food Science, BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
BOKU University · ATUniversity of Georgia · USSouthern Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ampicillin, an organic acid-based feed additive and a synbiotic preparation on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in the ceca of broilers. A total of 2000 broiler chickens (Ross 708) were randomly assigned to 5 groups with 8 replicates. The negative control group was the only group that was not subjected to avian pathogenic E. coli challenge, while all the other 4 groups received a multi-resistant E. coli strain that was resistant to ampicillin, cephalexin, and nalidixic acid as an oral challenge. The second group served as a challenge control, and the third group received the antibiotic ampicillin via water for 5 d. The fourth group received a feed additive based on organic acids and cinnamaldehyde, and the fifth group received a synbiotic preparation via feed and water. On day 17 and 38 of the trial, cecal samples from 3 birds from each of the 40 pens were obtained, and the E. coli counts and abundances of antibiotic-resistant E. coli were determined. Oral challenge with an avian pathogenic E. coli strain did not influence the performance, and there was no significant difference in growth performance between groups. The total E. coli count was lower (P < 0.05) in the group supplemented with the synbiotic than in the challenge control group on day 38 of the trial. Administration of an antibiotic for 5 d led to a significant increase in the abundance of E. coli strains resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, and ceftriaxone. There was no increase in the abundance of antibiotic-resistant E. coli observed in the groups that received feed supplemented with an organic acid/cinnamaldehyde-based feed additive or a synbiotic. Moreover, the effects of the tested feed additives on the prevalence of resistant E. coli are demonstrated by the lower ceftriaxone minimal inhibitory concentration values for this group than for the antibiotic group. Additionally, the synbiotic group exhibited lower ceftriaxone minimal inhibitory concentration values than the antibiotic group.

Indexed as

ChickensDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAcroleinAmpicillinAnimal FeedAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCecumDietEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsMaleSynbioticsAcroleinAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentscinnamaldehydeantibiotic resistanceAPECE. coli challengefeed additivepoultry

Identifiers

PMID30690607
PMCPMC6527514
OpenAlexW2915005291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.