ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2019
Effective implementation of the Accelerate Pheno™ system for positive blood cultures.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Label-free rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing with machine-learning based dynamic holographic laser speckle imaging.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2025Article
- Clinical impact of the accelerate PhenoTest® BC system on patients with gram-negative bacteremia and high risk of antimicrobial resistance: a prospective before-after implementation study.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2023Article
- Contemporary Considerations for Establishing Reference Methods for Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Gram positive cocci towards vancomycin using scanning electron microscopy.Current research in microbial sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Rapid Methods for Antimicrobial Resistance Diagnostics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Tier-1 AgentsFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Current state of the art in rapid diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance.Lab on a chip · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using conventional methods, organism identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) results are available ∼1.5-3 days after positive blood culture. New technologies can reduce this time to 8-12 h, allowing therapy to be optimized substantially sooner. To make full use of fast ID and AST results requires overcoming various hurdles to effective implementation, including restructuring laboratory workflows to optimize timeliness of results and modifying clinical pathways to respond more quickly when results are available. Efficient laboratory procedures and clinical interventions coupled with fast and accurate identification and AST results have the potential to substantially reduce overall costs and provide more-sophisticated and effective patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.