Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30690540›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2019

Impact of antimicrobial therapy on the gut microbiome.

Amira A Bhalodi, Tjitske S R van Engelen, Harjeet S Virk, W Joost Wiersinga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Antibacterial photoswitchable triazenic ciprofloxacins.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Association between Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Use and Risk of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Optimal antibiotic use in the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amira A BhalodiAccelerate Diagnostics, Inc., Scientific Affairs, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Tjitske S R van EngelenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Harjeet S VirkAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W Joost WiersingaAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome is now considered an organ unto itself and plays an important role in health maintenance and recovery from critical illness. The commensal organisms responsible for the framework of the gut microbiome are valuable in protection against disease and various physiological tasks. Critical illness and the associated interventions have a detrimental impact on the microbiome. While antimicrobials are one of the fundamental and often life-saving modalities in septic patients, they can also pave the way for subsequent harm because of the resulting damage to the gut microbiome. Contributing to many of the non-specific signs and symptoms of sepsis, the balance between the overuse of antimicrobials and the clinical need in these situations is often difficult to delineate. Given the potency of antimicrobials utilized to treat septic patients, the effects on the gut microbiome are often rapid and long-lasting, in which case full recovery may never be observed. The overgrowth of opportunistic pathogens is of significant concern as they can lead to infections that become increasingly difficult to treat. Continued research to understand the disturbances within the gut microbiome of critically ill patients and their outcomes is essential to help develop future therapies to circumvent damage to, or restore, the microbiome. In this review, we discuss the impact of the antimicrobials often used for the treatment of sepsis on the gut microbiota.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCritical IllnessGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMiceSepsisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30690540
PMCPMC6382031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.