Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30690462›Full record

ArticleMilitary medicine2019

Development of a Perceived Access Inventory for Community Care Mental Healthcare Services for Veterans.

Jeffrey M Pyne, P Adam Kelly, Ellen P Fischer, Christopher J Miller, Patricia Wright, Kara Zamora, Christopher J Koenig, Regina Stanley, Karen Seal, John C Fortney

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey M PyneCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 2200 Fort Roots Drive, North Little Rock, AR.
P Adam KellySoutheast Louisiana Veterans Healthcare System, New Orleans, LA.
Ellen P FischerCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 2200 Fort Roots Drive, North Little Rock, AR.
Christopher J MillerCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA.
Patricia WrightCollege of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
Kara ZamoraSan Francisco VA Healthcare System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA.
Christopher J KoenigSan Francisco VA Healthcare System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA.
Regina StanleyCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 2200 Fort Roots Drive, North Little Rock, AR.
Karen SealSan Francisco VA Healthcare System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA.
John C FortneyCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle WA.
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System · USSan Francisco VA Health Care System · USHarvard University · USSan Francisco State University · USTulane University · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

HSRD VA CRE 12-300HSRD VA I01 HX001114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccess to high-quality healthcare, including mental healthcare, is a high priority for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Meaningful monitoring of progress will require patient-centered measures of access. To that end, we developed the Perceived Access Inventory focused on access to VA mental health services (PAI-VA). However, VA is purchasing increasing amounts of mental health services from community mental health providers. In this paper, we describe the development of a PAI for users of VA-funded community mental healthcare that incorporates access barriers unique to community care service use and compares the barriers most frequently reported by veterans using community mental health services to those most frequently reported by veterans using VA mental health services. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted mixed qualitative and quantitative interviews with 25 veterans who had experience using community mental health services through the Veterans Choice Program (VCP). We used opt-out invitation letters to recruit veterans from three geographic regions. Data were collected on sociodemographics, rurality, symptom severity, and service satisfaction. Participants also completed two measures of perceived barriers to mental healthcare: the PAI-VA adapted to focus on access to mental healthcare in the community and Hoge's 13-item measure. This study was reviewed and approved by the VA Central Institutional Review Board.

resultsAnalysis of qualitative interview data identified four topics that were not addressed in the PAI-VA: veterans being billed directly by a VCP mental health provider, lack of care coordination and communication between VCP and VA mental health providers, veterans needing to travel to a VA facility to have VCP provider prescriptions filled, and delays in VCP re-authorization. To develop a PAI for community-care users, we created items corresponding to each of the four community-care-specific topics and added them to the 43-item PAI-VA. When we compared the 10 most frequently endorsed barriers to mental healthcare in this study sample to the ten most frequently endorsed by a separate sample of current VA mental healthcare users, six items were common to both groups. The four items unique to community-care were: long waits for the first mental health appointment, lack of awareness of available mental health services, short appointments, and providers' lack of knowledge of military culture.

conclusionsFour new barriers specific to veteran access to community mental healthcare were identified. These barriers, which were largely administrative rather than arising from the clinical encounter itself, were included in the PAI for community care. Study strengths include capturing access barriers from the veteran experience across three geographic regions. Weaknesses include the relatively small number of participants and data collection from an early stage of Veteran Choice Program implementation. As VA expands its coverage of community-based mental healthcare, being able to assess the success of the initiative from the perspective of program users becomes increasingly important. The 47-item PAI for community care offers a useful tool to identify barriers experienced by veterans in accessing mental healthcare in the community, overall and in specific settings, as well as to track the impact of interventions to improve access to mental healthcare.

Indexed as

PerceptionAdultAgedCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransaccesscommunity healthcaremental healthveterans

Identifiers

PMID30690462
PMCPMC7521611
OpenAlexW2912646593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.