ArticleNeuroImage2019
Dynamic causal modelling of fluctuating connectivity in resting-state EEG.
Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic causal modeling of low-density resting-state EEG in long-term meditation practitioners.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Harnessing electroencephalography connectomes for cognitive and clinical neuroscience.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Electroencephalography derived connectivity informing epilepsy surgical planning: Towards clinical applications and future perspectives.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2024Review
- Dynamic interactions between anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex link perceptual features and heart rate variability during movie viewing.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Dynamic causal modelling shows a prominent role of local inhibition in alpha power modulation in higher visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- A test-retest resting, and cognitive state EEG dataset during multiple subject-driven states.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Network analysis of preictal iEEG reveals changes in network structure preceding seizure onset.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A Novel Approach for Segment-Length Selection Based on Stationarity to Perform Effective Connectivity Analysis Applied to Resting-State EEG Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Influence of periaqueductal gray on other salience network nodes predicts social sensitivity.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Brain functional and effective connectivity based on electroencephalography recordings: A review.Human brain mapping · 2022Review
- A survey of brain network analysis by electroencephalographic signals.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2022Article
- Adiabatic dynamic causal modelling.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Article
- Altered Effective Brain Connectivity During Habituation in First Episode Schizophrenia With Auditory Verbal Hallucinations: A Dichotic Listening EEG Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- State-Dependent Effective Connectivity in Resting-State fMRI.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
- New Cognitive Neurotechnology Facilitates Studies of Cortical-Subcortical Interactions.Trends in biotechnology · 2020Review
- Spectral graph theory of brain oscillations.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- The role of node dynamics in shaping emergent functional connectivity patterns in the brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Article
- Predicting Motor Imagery Performance From Resting-State EEG Using Dynamic Causal Modeling.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Reduced Dynamic Interactions Within Intrinsic Functional Brain Networks in Early Blind Patients.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional and effective connectivity are known to change systematically over time. These changes might be explained by several factors, including intrinsic fluctuations in activity-dependent neuronal coupling and contextual factors, like experimental condition and time. Furthermore, contextual effects may be subject-specific or conserved over subjects. To characterize fluctuations in effective connectivity, we used dynamic causal modelling (DCM) of cross spectral responses over 1- min of electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings during rest, divided into 1-sec windows. We focused on two intrinsic networks: the default mode and the saliency network. DCM was applied to estimate connectivity in each time-window for both networks. Fluctuations in DCM connectivity parameters were assessed using hierarchical parametric empirical Bayes (PEB). Within-subject, between-window effects were modelled with a second-level linear model with temporal basis functions as regressors. This procedure was conducted for every subject separately. Bayesian model reduction was then used to assess which (combination of) temporal basis functions best explain dynamic connectivity over windows. A third (between-subject) level model was used to infer which dynamic connectivity parameters are conserved over subjects. Our results indicate that connectivity fluctuations in the default mode network and to a lesser extent the saliency network comprised both subject-specific components and a common component. For both networks, connections to higher order regions appear to monotonically increase during the 1- min period. These results not only establish the predictive validity of dynamic connectivity estimates - in virtue of detecting systematic changes over subjects - they also suggest a network-specific dissociation in the relative contribution of fluctuations in connectivity that depend upon experimental context. We envisage these procedures could be useful for characterizing brain state transitions that may be explained by their cognitive or neuropathological underpinnings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.