Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689890›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2019

Repurposing ethyl bromopyruvate as a broad-spectrum antibacterial.

Ajay Kumar, Vishant Mahendra Boradia, Ritesh Thakare, Alok Kumar Singh, Zahid Gani, Swetarka Das, Anil Patidar, Arunava Dasgupta, Sidharth Chopra, Manoj Raje and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drug Repurposing: An Emerging Strategy inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Diclofenac Resensitizes Methicillin-ResistantAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ajay KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Phase X, Sector 67, SAS Nagar, Punjab, India.
Vishant Mahendra BoradiaDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Phase X, Sector 67, SAS Nagar, Punjab, India.
Ritesh ThakareDivision of Microbiology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR-CDRI), Sitapur Road, Sector 10, Janakipuram Extension, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Alok Kumar SinghDivision of Microbiology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR-CDRI), Sitapur Road, Sector 10, Janakipuram Extension, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Zahid GaniDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Phase X, Sector 67, SAS Nagar, Punjab, India.
Swetarka DasDivision of Microbiology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR-CDRI), Sitapur Road, Sector 10, Janakipuram Extension, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anil PatidarCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology (CSIR-IMTECH), Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India.
Arunava DasguptaDivision of Microbiology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR-CDRI), Sitapur Road, Sector 10, Janakipuram Extension, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sidharth ChopraDivision of Microbiology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR-CDRI), Sitapur Road, Sector 10, Janakipuram Extension, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manoj RajeCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology (CSIR-IMTECH), Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India.
Chaaya Iyengar RajeDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Phase X, Sector 67, SAS Nagar, Punjab, India.
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research · INNational Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research · INCentral Drug Research Institute · INInstitute of Microbial Technology · IN

Funding

Maintaining Abstinence and Reducing HIV Risk in Adolescent GirlsR03NR010193 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MORRISON-BEEDY, DIANNE C · 2006 to 2007
$152k
Visual Feedback Goggle for Positional Vertigo TreatmentR43NR010191 · NINR · VERTIGONE, INC. · PI ANTHONY, PHILIP FOWLER · 2006 to 2006
$100k
NINR NIH HHS R03 NR010193NINR NIH HHS R43 NR010191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence of drug-resistant bacteria is a major hurdle for effective treatment of infections caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and ESKAPE pathogens. In comparison with conventional drug discovery, drug repurposing offers an effective yet rapid approach to identifying novel antibiotics.

methodsEthyl bromopyruvate was evaluated for its ability to inhibit M. tuberculosis and ESKAPE pathogens using growth inhibition assays. The selectivity index of ethyl bromopyruvate was determined, followed by time-kill kinetics against M. tuberculosis and Staphylococcus aureus. We first tested its ability to synergize with approved drugs and then tested its ability to decimate bacterial biofilm. Intracellular killing of M. tuberculosis was determined and in vivo potential was determined in a neutropenic murine model of S. aureus infection.

resultsWe identified ethyl bromopyruvate as an equipotent broad-spectrum antibacterial agent targeting drug-susceptible and -resistant M. tuberculosis and ESKAPE pathogens. Ethyl bromopyruvate exhibited concentration-dependent bactericidal activity. In M. tuberculosis, ethyl bromopyruvate inhibited GAPDH with a concomitant reduction in ATP levels and transferrin-mediated iron uptake. Apart from GAPDH, this compound inhibited pyruvate kinase, isocitrate lyase and malate synthase to varying extents. Ethyl bromopyruvate did not negatively interact with any drug and significantly reduced biofilm at a 64-fold lower concentration than vancomycin. When tested in an S. aureus neutropenic thigh infection model, ethyl bromopyruvate exhibited efficacy equal to that of vancomycin in reducing bacterial counts in thigh, and at 1/25th of the dosage.

conclusionsEthyl bromopyruvate exhibits all the characteristics required to be positioned as a potential broad-spectrum antibacterial agent.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDrug RepositioningEnzyme InhibitorsGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Phosphorylating)Mice, Inbred BALB CMicrobial ViabilityMycobacterium tuberculosisPyruvatesStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusTransferrinTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsbromopyruvateEnzyme InhibitorsGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Phosphorylating)PyruvatesTransferrin

Identifiers

PMID30689890
PMCPMC6419618
OpenAlexW2912613781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.