Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30689862›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019

Small Segmental Duplications in Drosophila-High Rate of Emergence and Elimination.

Juan Li, Lan Jiang, Chung-I Wu, Xuemei Lu, Shu Fang, Chau-Ti Ting

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juan LiKey Laboratory of Genomics and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Beijing; CAS Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Kunming, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Lan JiangKey Laboratory of Genomics and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Beijing; CAS Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Kunming, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Chung-I WuKey Laboratory of Genomics and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Beijing; CAS Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Kunming, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Xuemei LuKey Laboratory of Genomics and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Beijing; CAS Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Kunming, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Shu FangBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chau-Ti TingInstitute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmental duplications are an important class of mutations. Because a large proportion of segmental duplications may often be strongly deleterious, high frequency or fixed segmental duplications may represent only a tiny fraction of the mutational input. To understand the emergence and elimination of segmental duplications, we survey polymorphic duplications, including tandem and interspersed duplications, in natural populations of Drosophila by haploid embryo genomes. As haploid embryos are not expected to be heterozygous, the genome, sites of heterozygosity (referred to as pseudoheterozygous sites [PHS]), may likely represent recent duplications that have acquired new mutations. Among the 29 genomes of Drosophila melanogaster, we identify 2,282 polymorphic PHS duplications (linked PHS regions) in total or 154 PHS duplications per genome. Most PHS duplications are small (83.4% < 500 bp), Drosophila melanogaster lineage specific, and strain specific (72.6% singletons). The excess of the observed singleton PHS duplications deviates significantly from the neutral expectation, suggesting that most PHS duplications are strongly deleterious. In addition, these small segmental duplications are not evenly distributed in genomic regions and less common in noncoding functional element regions. The underrepresentation in RNA polymerase II binding sites and regions with active histone modifications is correlated with ages of duplications. In conclusion, small segmental duplications occur frequently in Drosophila but rapidly eliminated by natural selection.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterGenome, InsectSelection, Genetichaploid genomeisogenic genomepolymorphic duplicationpseudoheterozygous sitepurifying selection

Identifiers

PMID30689862
PMCPMC6380325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.